WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Physics · Source-linked note

Precision two-photon measurement of the muonium 1s–2s interval

Meyer and colleagues measured the muonium 1s–2s interval using counterpropagating two-photon laser excitation, photoionization and muon detection. Pulse-by-pulse laser diagnostics, an iodine frequency reference and deuterium control measurements supported the analysis of 99 muonium events. After correcting to the hyperfine centroid, they reported a transition frequency of 2,455,528,941.0±9.8 MHz. Comparisons with bound-state quantum electrodynamics provided conditional determinations of the positive-muon mass and constraints on the muon–electron charge ratio.

Read original sources · Check the exact scope · Choose a next step

What is recorded here?

Meyer and colleagues measured the muonium 1s–2s interval using counterpropagating two-photon laser excitation, photoionization and muon detection. Pulse-by-pulse laser diagnostics, an iodine frequency reference and deuterium control measurements supported the analysis of 99 muonium events. After correcting to the hyperfine centroid, they reported a transition frequency of 2,455,528,941.0±9.8 MHz. Comparisons with bound-state quantum electrodynamics provided conditional determinations of the positive-muon mass and constraints on the muon–electron charge ratio.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

The measured line centre depends on pulse-dependent lineshape modelling, reference calibration and Doppler and hyperfine corrections. Mass-ratio extraction uses QED and equal-magnitude charges; interpreting the same spectrum as a charge-ratio constraint instead uses external mass information. These are distinct conditional interpretations, not independent simultaneous measurements of both unknown ratios. The historical result and its uncertainty do not establish exact charge equality, exclude every new interaction or replace later theoretical updates.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

V. Meyer; S. N. Bagayev; P. E. G. Baird; P. Bakule; M. G. Boshier; A. Breitrück; S. L. Cornish; S. Dychkov; G. H. Eaton; A. Grossmann; D. Hübl; V. W. Hughes; K. Jungmann; I. C. Lane; Yi-Wei Liu; D. Lucas; Y. Matyugin; J. Merkel; G. zu Putlitz; I. Reinhard; P. G. H. Sandars; R. Santra; P. Schmidt; C. A. Scott; W. T. Toner; M. Towrie; K. Träger; L. Willmann; V. Yakhontov

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

Precision two-photon measurement of the muonium 1s–2s interval

Meyer and colleagues measured the muonium 1s–2s interval using counterpropagating two-photon laser excitation, photoionization and muon detection. Pulse-by-pulse laser diagnostics, an iodine frequency reference and deuterium control measurements supported the analysis of 99 muonium events. After correcting to the hyperfine centroid, they reported a transition frequency of 2,455,528,941.0±9.8 MHz. Comparisons with bound-state quantum electrodynamics provided conditional determinations of the positive-muon mass and constraints on the muon–electron charge ratio.

Scientific scope

The measured line centre depends on pulse-dependent lineshape modelling, reference calibration and Doppler and hyperfine corrections. Mass-ratio extraction uses QED and equal-magnitude charges; interpreting the same spectrum as a charge-ratio constraint instead uses external mass information. These are distinct conditional interpretations, not independent simultaneous measurements of both unknown ratios. The historical result and its uncertainty do not establish exact charge equality, exclude every new interaction or replace later theoretical updates.

Reading status

This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.

People and systems

V. Meyer; S. N. Bagayev; P. E. G. Baird; P. Bakule; M. G. Boshier; A. Breitrück; S. L. Cornish; S. Dychkov; G. H. Eaton; A. Grossmann; D. Hübl; V. W. Hughes; K. Jungmann; I. C. Lane; Yi-Wei Liu; D. Lucas; Y. Matyugin; J. Merkel; G. zu Putlitz; I. Reinhard; P. G. H. Sandars; R. Santra; P. Schmidt; C. A. Scott; W. T. Toner; M. Towrie; K. Träger; L. Willmann; V. Yakhontov

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Original sources