What is recorded here?
Scaled recurrent PPO self-play with distributed rollout/inference/optimization and continual-training infrastructure, producing a team agent that defeated Team OG in the documented2019 Dota2 setting.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
Uses inherited PPO/GAE/LSTM/Adam and shaped rewards. Evaluation supports17heroes, excludes specified multi-unit items, uses semantic engine observations rather than pixels, and retains scripted item/ability/courier logic. Defeating the team in that setting is not solving unrestricted Dota2 or certifying unexploitable equilibrium.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Christopher Berner; Greg Brockman; Brooke Chan; Vicki Cheung; Przemysław Dębiak; Christy Dennison; David Farhi; Quirin Fischer; Shariq Hashme; Chris Hesse; Rafal Józefowicz; Scott Gray; Catherine Olsson; Jakub Pachocki; Michael Petrov; Henrique Pondé de Oliveira Pinto; Jonathan Raiman; Tim Salimans; Jeremy Schlatter; Jonas Schneider; Szymon Sidor; Ilya Sutskever; Jie Tang; Filip Wolski; Susan Zhang
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
OpenAI Five: scaled self-play for team Dota2
Scaled recurrent PPO self-play with distributed rollout/inference/optimization and continual-training infrastructure, producing a team agent that defeated Team OG in the documented2019 Dota2 setting.
Scientific scope
Uses inherited PPO/GAE/LSTM/Adam and shaped rewards. Evaluation supports17heroes, excludes specified multi-unit items, uses semantic engine observations rather than pixels, and retains scripted item/ability/courier logic. Defeating the team in that setting is not solving unrestricted Dota2 or certifying unexploitable equilibrium.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Christopher Berner; Greg Brockman; Brooke Chan; Vicki Cheung; Przemysław Dębiak; Christy Dennison; David Farhi; Quirin Fischer; Shariq Hashme; Chris Hesse; Rafal Józefowicz; Scott Gray; Catherine Olsson; Jakub Pachocki; Michael Petrov; Henrique Pondé de Oliveira Pinto; Jonathan Raiman; Tim Salimans; Jeremy Schlatter; Jonas Schneider; Szymon Sidor; Ilya Sutskever; Jie Tang; Filip Wolski; Susan Zhang
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.