WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Earth & space · Source-linked note

Galaxy ages trace the cosmic expansion history

Jimenez, Verde, Treu and Stern used the upper age envelope of selected SDSS galaxies to estimate the low-redshift expansion rate, finding H₀ = 69 ± 12 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ in their 2003 analysis. Simon, Verde and Jimenez subsequently combined selected galaxy spectra, including previously analyzed objects and new survey data, to estimate H(z) at nine redshifts and fit a parameterized dark-energy potential; the resulting potential was consistent with a constant within the stated uncertainties.

Read original sources · Check the exact scope · Choose a next step

What is recorded here?

Jimenez, Verde, Treu and Stern used the upper age envelope of selected SDSS galaxies to estimate the low-redshift expansion rate, finding H₀ = 69 ± 12 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ in their 2003 analysis. Simon, Verde and Jimenez subsequently combined selected galaxy spectra, including previously analyzed objects and new survey data, to estimate H(z) at nine redshifts and fit a parameterized dark-energy potential; the resulting potential was consistent with a constant within the stated uncertainties.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

Stellar ages depend on population-synthesis fits, passive-evolution assumptions and galaxy selection, not direct clocks. The 2003 low-redshift fit extends to z = 0.17 at effective z = 0.09 and uses an approximately 4% extrapolation to H₀ in its reference cosmology. The later work reuses earlier galaxy data and the earlier low-redshift determination; the two are not independent detections. Its galaxy sample is small, and dark-energy potential reconstruction assumes spatial flatness, chosen parameterization and matter-density priors. Consistency with a constant potential does not exclude evolution. Forecasts for future surveys are not achieved results.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

Raul Jimenez; Licia Verde; Tommaso Treu; Daniel Stern; Joan Simon

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

Galaxy ages trace the cosmic expansion history

Jimenez, Verde, Treu and Stern used the upper age envelope of selected SDSS galaxies to estimate the low-redshift expansion rate, finding H₀ = 69 ± 12 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ in their 2003 analysis. Simon, Verde and Jimenez subsequently combined selected galaxy spectra, including previously analyzed objects and new survey data, to estimate H(z) at nine redshifts and fit a parameterized dark-energy potential; the resulting potential was consistent with a constant within the stated uncertainties.

Scientific scope

Stellar ages depend on population-synthesis fits, passive-evolution assumptions and galaxy selection, not direct clocks. The 2003 low-redshift fit extends to z = 0.17 at effective z = 0.09 and uses an approximately 4% extrapolation to H₀ in its reference cosmology. The later work reuses earlier galaxy data and the earlier low-redshift determination; the two are not independent detections. Its galaxy sample is small, and dark-energy potential reconstruction assumes spatial flatness, chosen parameterization and matter-density priors. Consistency with a constant potential does not exclude evolution. Forecasts for future surveys are not achieved results.

Reading status

This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.

People and systems

Raul Jimenez; Licia Verde; Tommaso Treu; Daniel Stern; Joan Simon

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Original sources