WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Physics · Source-linked note

Redesigned oscillators constrain helium supersolid-like responses in confined and bulk samples

Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.

Read original sources · Check the exact scope · Choose a next step

What is recorded here?

Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

These limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

Duk Y. Kim; Moses H. W. Chan

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

Redesigned oscillators constrain helium supersolid-like responses in confined and bulk samples

Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.

Scientific scope

These limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.

Reading status

This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.

People and systems

Duk Y. Kim; Moses H. W. Chan

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Original sources