{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "duk-kim-chan-vycor-helium-null-2012",
    "title": "Redesigned oscillators constrain helium supersolid-like responses in confined and bulk samples",
    "summary": "Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.",
    "boundary": "These limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.",
    "area": "Low-temperature physics",
    "topic": "Physics",
    "year": 2012,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "EMPIRICAL",
    "package_id": "duk-kim-chan-vycor-helium-null-2012",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:389b1737-604c-47f1-af17-b6f09c5308c7",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:7b18afe2dd466ee0e94d4ac35df0eca19ab79302839728c01817823887a9e2fb"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Duk Y. Kim",
      "Moses H. W. Chan"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "duk-kim-chan-vycor-helium-null-2012-v1",
        "title": "Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous Vycor glass",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7050v1",
        "date": "2012-07-30"
      },
      {
        "id": "duk-kim-chan-bulk-helium-limit-2014-v1",
        "title": "Upper limit of supersolidity in solid helium",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.2132v1",
        "date": "2014-07-08"
      }
    ],
    "points": "85000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "duk-kim-chan-vycor-helium-null-2012",
      "entry_id": "duk-kim-chan-vycor-helium-null-2012",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": "-",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:389b1737-604c-47f1-af17-b6f09c5308c7",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:7b18afe2dd466ee0e94d4ac35df0eca19ab79302839728c01817823887a9e2fb"
      },
      "what_changed": "Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.",
      "scope": "Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4. These limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:389b1737-604c-47f1-af17-b6f09c5308c7",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:7b18afe2dd466ee0e94d4ac35df0eca19ab79302839728c01817823887a9e2fb"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-28T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Duk Y. Kim",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous Vycor glass",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7050v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Moses H. W. Chan",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous Vycor glass",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7050v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous Vycor glass",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7050v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-1",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Upper limit of supersolidity in solid helium",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.2132v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "These limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.",
        "domain": "Low-temperature physics"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous Vycor glass",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7050v1"
        },
        {
          "citation": "Upper limit of supersolidity in solid helium",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.2132v1"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Redesigned oscillators constrain helium supersolid-like responses in confined and bulk samples\n\nDuk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThese limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.\n\n## Reading status\n\nThis is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.\n\n## People and systems\n\nDuk Y. Kim; Moses H. W. Chan\n\nThese are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.\n\n\n\n## Original sources\n\n- [Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous Vycor glass](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7050v1)\n- [Upper limit of supersolidity in solid helium](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.2132v1)\n",
      "summary": "Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.",
      "title": "Redesigned oscillators constrain helium supersolid-like responses in confined and bulk samples"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:389b1737-604c-47f1-af17-b6f09c5308c7",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:389b1737-604c-47f1-af17-b6f09c5308c7",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:7b18afe2dd466ee0e94d4ac35df0eca19ab79302839728c01817823887a9e2fb"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:27ca5babb61340c41de58146444d242ae5b7a5a779be9a4bf63119a83fb62d96"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:389b1737-604c-47f1-af17-b6f09c5308c7",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:7b18afe2dd466ee0e94d4ac35df0eca19ab79302839728c01817823887a9e2fb"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "duk-kim-chan-vycor-helium-null-2012",
    "entry_id": "duk-kim-chan-vycor-helium-null-2012",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Redesigned oscillators constrain helium supersolid-like responses in confined and bulk samples",
    "context": "Low-temperature physics",
    "track": "Source-reported experimental result or reusable measurement method",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": "-",
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-28",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-28",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4.",
    "scope": "Duk Y. Kim and Moses H. W. Chan redesigned a porous-glass torsional oscillator and reported no detectable low-temperature response attributable to nonclassical rotational inertia at a sensitivity of 2 × 10⁻⁵. In a separate bulk-helium study using rigid oscillators they reported a sample- and apparatus-dependent upper limit of 4 × 10⁻⁶ and a comparable period shift in solid helium-3 and helium-4. These limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. These limits apply to the specified samples, sensitivity and oscillator response, not to all possible materials or measurements. The 2014 bulk study found period shifts three to four times its finite-element shear-modulus estimate and discusses imperfect rigidity, crystal properties and underestimated elastic response; its 4 × 10⁻⁶ bound attributes the small observed response entirely to possible nonclassical inertia. A helium-3 repeat differed from an earlier run whose instrumental stability was questioned. The 2012 confined-helium explanation of the earlier signal depends on an unknown solid-layer thickness. The earlier 2004 results are distinct; independent raw-data reanalysis and comparison with final journal versions remain outstanding. E. Kim in the 2004 work is not the later coauthor Duk Y. Kim.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Absence of supersolidity in solid helium in porous Vycor glass",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7050v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      },
      {
        "title": "Upper limit of supersolidity in solid helium",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.2132v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "The named authors in the research record",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:389b1737-604c-47f1-af17-b6f09c5308c7",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:7b18afe2dd466ee0e94d4ac35df0eca19ab79302839728c01817823887a9e2fb"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "85000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": null,
  "reading_status": "SOURCE_LINKED_NOTE"
}