What is recorded here?
Showed why correlation is not a measure of agreement and described plotting paired-method differences against their means with estimated bias and limits of agreement.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
The record is the exact two-author 1986 Lancet paper and its method-comparison analysis. The illustrative peak-flow data were not a representative clinical validation, and later extensions and terminology remain separate.
Read the original work
- Bland and Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement
- Crossref record for Bland and Altman 1986
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
J. Martin Bland; Douglas G. Altman
The named authors contributed to this scoped work; individual effort shares and later applications are not assigned by the byline.
Research locations and affiliations
Documented mapping · Included in country comparison
Documented countries / regions: United Kingdom
Documented research locations or paper affiliations for this contribution. Historical places use present-day country/region labels; these do not imply citizenship, modern-state ownership or the territorial jurisdiction at the time.
English catalogue narrative
Bland and Altman: assessing agreement between clinical measurement methods
Showed why correlation is not a measure of agreement and described plotting paired-method differences against their means with estimated bias and limits of agreement.
Scientific scope
The record is the exact two-author 1986 Lancet paper and its method-comparison analysis. The illustrative peak-flow data were not a representative clinical validation, and later extensions and terminology remain separate.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
J. Martin Bland; Douglas G. Altman
The named authors contributed to this scoped work; individual effort shares and later applications are not assigned by the byline.