WRSWorld Research StateContribute
WORLD RESEARCH STATE

SWAG: adversarially filtered grounded event completion

Contribution grade

Commonsense inference benchmarks · Evaluation resource design

Reference score115,000Provisional editorial estimate of this exact contribution; its grade is assessed separately.

What changed

Used video-caption contexts and language-model-generated alternatives, iteratively filtering easy negatives with stylistic classifiers and validating choices to build grounded next-event questions.

Scientific scope

Used video-caption contexts and language-model-generated alternatives, iteratively filtering easy negatives with stylistic classifiers and validating choices to build grounded next-event questions. Filtering is relative to the selected classifier family and candidate-generation process, not universal removal of bias. The contribution is the original SWAG resource and filtering procedure, distinct from the already catalogued HellaSwag successor.

Evidence

The linked original sources describe the stated contribution and its evidence limits. WRS has not independently rerun the experiments or certified a proof. Filtering is relative to the selected classifier family and candidate-generation process, not universal removal of bias. The contribution is the original SWAG resource and filtering procedure, distinct from the already catalogued HellaSwag successor.

Contributors

Provisional WRS assessment, edition 2026-10-16.1. Independent expert calibration is pending. This grade does not certify correctness or assign ownership.

Full scientific record · Browse contribution grades · Request a correction