WRSWorld Research StateContribute
WORLD RESEARCH STATE

Pedersen: verify shared secret pieces without exposing the secret

Contribution grade

Computer science · Computer science

Reference score170,000Provisional editorial estimate of this exact contribution; its grade is assessed separately.

What changed

Two-generator perfectly hiding commitments combine with polynomial shares so recipients verify consistency non-interactively; secret privacy is information-theoretic while share consistency relies on the dealer not knowing the generator discrete-log relation.

Scientific scope

Two-generator perfectly hiding commitments combine with polynomial shares so recipients verify consistency non-interactively; secret privacy is information-theoretic while share consistency relies on the dealer not knowing the generator discrete-log relation. The construction combines threshold sharing with commitments in a prime-order group. Perfect hiding uses uniformly random blinding; computational binding assumes that the discrete-log relationship between the two generators is unknown to the committing party. Share verification and reconstruction use the stated participant indices, threshold and broadcast/private-channel model. Information-theoretic privacy does not mean unconditional resistance to malicious inconsistent openings. The work was presented at CRYPTO 1991 and printed in 1992. WRS has not independently reconstructed the full security proof or certified the exact formula transcription.

Evidence

Source-linked, scoped account of the original work. The published scope states the scientific assumptions and remaining verification limits. WRS has not independently certified the full proof, experimental result or system benchmark.

Contributors

Provisional WRS assessment, edition 2026-10-16.1. Independent expert calibration is pending. This grade does not certify correctness or assign ownership.

Full scientific record · Browse contribution grades · Request a correction