BWhat changed
Reported six selected patients receiving subgenual-cingulate stimulation with clinical and blood-flow observations.
Scientific scope
The record is the exact eight-author 2005 study. It is a small uncontrolled pilot in a selected refractory population; it does not establish general efficacy, comparative effectiveness, long-term safety or applicability to other targets and disorders.
Evidence
The linked sources identify this contribution and its scope. WRS has not independently reconstructed the scientific claims. The record is the exact eight-author 2005 study. It is a small uncontrolled pilot in a selected refractory population; it does not establish general efficacy, comparative effectiveness, long-term safety or applicability to other targets and disorders.
Contributors
- Helen S. Mayberg · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
- Andres M. Lozano · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
- Valerie Voon · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
- Heather E. McNeely · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
- David Seminowicz · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
- Clement Hamani · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
- Jason M. Schwalb · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
- Sidney H. Kennedy · SCIENCE: Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured.
Provisional WRS assessment, edition 2026-10-16.1. Independent expert calibration is pending. This grade does not certify correctness or assign ownership.
Full scientific record · Browse contribution grades · Request a correction