WRSWorld Research StateContribute
WORLD RESEARCH STATE

Complementary X-ray evidence of charge order competing with superconductivity in underdoped cuprates

Contribution grade

Condensed-matter physics · Source-reported experimental result or reusable measurement method

Reference score85,000Provisional editorial estimate of this exact contribution; its grade is assessed separately.

What changed

In 2012 Chang and colleagues used nonresonant hard X-ray diffraction on an underdoped YBa₂Cu₃O₆.₆₇ crystal to identify incommensurate lattice-modulation peaks associated with charge order; the peak weakened below the superconducting transition and increased under an applied magnetic field. Separately, Ghiringhelli and colleagues used resonant soft X-ray scattering near the Cu L₃ edge on underdoped Y- and Nd-based 123 cuprates, identifying a quasi-elastic charge-associated peak near 0.31 reciprocal lattice units. Its intensity and correlation length rose on cooling toward the superconducting transition and fell below it, supporting competition between the measured charge correlations and superconductivity.

Scientific scope

In 2012 Chang and colleagues used nonresonant hard X-ray diffraction on an underdoped YBa₂Cu₃O₆.₆₇ crystal to identify incommensurate lattice-modulation peaks associated with charge order; the peak weakened below the superconducting transition and increased under an applied magnetic field. Separately, Ghiringhelli and colleagues used resonant soft X-ray scattering near the Cu L₃ edge on underdoped Y- and Nd-based 123 cuprates, identifying a quasi-elastic charge-associated peak near 0.31 reciprocal lattice units. Its intensity and correlation length rose on cooling toward the superconducting transition and fell below it, supporting competition between the measured charge correlations and superconductivity. The hard X-ray experiment primarily measures atomic displacements in one detwinned oxygen-ordered sample and cannot distinguish two coexisting wavevectors from separate domains. The resonant study probes the electronic response in selected samples, with peaks reported at hole dopings 0.09–0.13; its approximately 130 meV instrumental energy resolution does not resolve the low-energy fluctuation spectrum. Its interpretation of charge correlations uses polarization comparisons and model assumptions. The studies have distinct methods and source-specific author lists; these observations do not establish a universal mechanism for high-temperature superconductivity or prove Fermi-surface reconstruction.

Evidence

The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. The hard X-ray experiment primarily measures atomic displacements in one detwinned oxygen-ordered sample and cannot distinguish two coexisting wavevectors from separate domains. The resonant study probes the electronic response in selected samples, with peaks reported at hole dopings 0.09–0.13; its approximately 130 meV instrumental energy resolution does not resolve the low-energy fluctuation spectrum. Its interpretation of charge correlations uses polarization comparisons and model assumptions. The studies have distinct methods and source-specific author lists; these observations do not establish a universal mechanism for high-temperature superconductivity or prove Fermi-surface reconstruction.

Contributors

Provisional WRS assessment, edition 2026-10-28.1. Independent expert calibration is pending. This grade does not certify correctness or assign ownership.

Full scientific record · Browse contribution grades · Request a correction