WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Physics · Source-linked note

A neutral excitation gap forces zero charge susceptibility in local quantum matter

Watanabe connected a gap within a fixed conserved-charge sector to the static response of that charge at zero temperature. For local quantum systems with a U(1) symmetry, a subregion charge fluctuation creates a neutral variational excitation. The boundary cost of this excitation forces charge fluctuations per volume to vanish when the neutral gap stays positive. Combining this with a susceptibility bound gives zero charge susceptibility, without translation symmetry or a quasiparticle description. The result clarifies part of the connection between magnetization plateaus and neutral-excitation constraints.

Read original sources · Check the exact scope · Choose a next step

What is recorded here?

Watanabe connected a gap within a fixed conserved-charge sector to the static response of that charge at zero temperature. For local quantum systems with a U(1) symmetry, a subregion charge fluctuation creates a neutral variational excitation. The boundary cost of this excitation forces charge fluctuations per volume to vanish when the neutral gap stays positive. Combining this with a susceptibility bound gives zero charge susceptibility, without translation symmetry or a quasiparticle description. The result clarifies part of the connection between magnetization plateaus and neutral-excitation constraints.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

The argument uses local Hamiltonian and charge densities, a well-defined reservoir and thermodynamic response limit, and a unique ground state within the selected charge sector. Its extension to symmetry-breaking degeneracy relies on suppressed matrix elements between the distinct states. The conclusion is zero susceptibility at the specified chemical potential; it does not by itself prove a plateau on a finite interval or a gap to charged excitations. The converse fails: gapless neutral excitations can coexist with zero susceptibility or a magnetization plateau.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

Haruki Watanabe

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

A neutral excitation gap forces zero charge susceptibility in local quantum matter

Watanabe connected a gap within a fixed conserved-charge sector to the static response of that charge at zero temperature. For local quantum systems with a U(1) symmetry, a subregion charge fluctuation creates a neutral variational excitation. The boundary cost of this excitation forces charge fluctuations per volume to vanish when the neutral gap stays positive. Combining this with a susceptibility bound gives zero charge susceptibility, without translation symmetry or a quasiparticle description. The result clarifies part of the connection between magnetization plateaus and neutral-excitation constraints.

Scientific scope

The argument uses local Hamiltonian and charge densities, a well-defined reservoir and thermodynamic response limit, and a unique ground state within the selected charge sector. Its extension to symmetry-breaking degeneracy relies on suppressed matrix elements between the distinct states. The conclusion is zero susceptibility at the specified chemical potential; it does not by itself prove a plateau on a finite interval or a gap to charged excitations. The converse fails: gapless neutral excitations can coexist with zero susceptibility or a magnetization plateau.

Reading status

This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.

People and systems

Haruki Watanabe

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Original sources