WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Computing & AI · Source-linked note

Suzgun and colleagues: BIG-Bench Hard reasoning evaluation

Selected challenging BIG-bench tasks and compared answer-only with chain-of-thought prompting on those tasks.

What is recorded here?

Selected challenging BIG-bench tasks and compared answer-only with chain-of-thought prompting on those tasks.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

Subset selection and prompt conditions shape comparisons. This is not the invention of chain-of-thought or proof of general reasoning ability.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

Mirac Suzgun; Nathan Scales; Nathanael Schärli; Sebastian Gehrmann; Yi Tay; Hyung Won Chung; Aakanksha Chowdhery; Quoc V. Le; Ed H. Chi; Denny Zhou; Jason Wei

Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

Suzgun and colleagues: BIG-Bench Hard reasoning evaluation

Selected challenging BIG-bench tasks and compared answer-only with chain-of-thought prompting on those tasks.

Scientific scope

Subset selection and prompt conditions shape comparisons. This is not the invention of chain-of-thought or proof of general reasoning ability.

Reading status

This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.

People and systems

Mirac Suzgun; Nathan Scales; Nathanael Schärli; Sebastian Gehrmann; Yi Tay; Hyung Won Chung; Aakanksha Chowdhery; Quoc V. Le; Ed H. Chi; Denny Zhou; Jason Wei

Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.

Original sources