What is recorded here?
Shapiro and colleagues tested the extra round-trip delay of radar signals passing near the Sun using planetary echoes. Their 1968 preliminary analysis combined orbital modeling with Mercury and Venus observations and reported agreement with the general-relativistic delay within the estimated experimental uncertainty. A later 1971 analysis combined further Haystack and Arecibo measurements and fitted a delay scale of about 1.02 relative to the general-relativistic prediction of 1, with an estimated 0.05 uncertainty including systematics.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
The measurements use joint orbital and timing models, rather than directly observing a coordinate-time quantity independent of model assumptions. In 1968 the authors report a hardware-processing defect requiring empirical correction and unresolved inter-observatory differences; they state raw measurements were not retained for complete reprocessing. The 1971 systematic estimate includes solar plasma and planetary topography. The 1968 report gives a delay coefficient of 0.9 ± 0.2, whereas the 1971 text cites 0.09 ± 0.2 for the earlier result; this conflicts with the earlier paper and adjacent conversion, and the effect of the 1968 erratum remains unresolved. These reports share observations and have distinct bylines; they are separate from the 1964 theoretical proposal and later spacecraft tests.
Read the original work
- Fourth Test of General Relativity: New Radar Result
- Fourth Test of General Relativity: Preliminary Results
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Irwin I. Shapiro; Michael E. Ash; Richard P. Ingalls; William B. Smith; Donald B. Campbell; Rolf B. Dyce; Raymond F. Jurgens; Gordon H. Pettengill; Melvin L. Stone; Richard A. Brockelman
These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged. The recorded author list is incomplete.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Planetary radar measurements test the solar gravitational time delay
Shapiro and colleagues tested the extra round-trip delay of radar signals passing near the Sun using planetary echoes. Their 1968 preliminary analysis combined orbital modeling with Mercury and Venus observations and reported agreement with the general-relativistic delay within the estimated experimental uncertainty. A later 1971 analysis combined further Haystack and Arecibo measurements and fitted a delay scale of about 1.02 relative to the general-relativistic prediction of 1, with an estimated 0.05 uncertainty including systematics.
Scientific scope
The measurements use joint orbital and timing models, rather than directly observing a coordinate-time quantity independent of model assumptions. In 1968 the authors report a hardware-processing defect requiring empirical correction and unresolved inter-observatory differences; they state raw measurements were not retained for complete reprocessing. The 1971 systematic estimate includes solar plasma and planetary topography. The 1968 report gives a delay coefficient of 0.9 ± 0.2, whereas the 1971 text cites 0.09 ± 0.2 for the earlier result; this conflicts with the earlier paper and adjacent conversion, and the effect of the 1968 erratum remains unresolved. These reports share observations and have distinct bylines; they are separate from the 1964 theoretical proposal and later spacecraft tests.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Irwin I. Shapiro; Michael E. Ash; Richard P. Ingalls; William B. Smith; Donald B. Campbell; Rolf B. Dyce; Raymond F. Jurgens; Gordon H. Pettengill; Melvin L. Stone; Richard A. Brockelman
These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.