What is recorded here?
Clustered user actions in a fixed pin-embedding space with hierarchical Ward clustering, represented each cluster by a medoid and sampled important medoids for retrieval using daily and online updates.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
Uses existing PinSage embeddings, Ward clustering and approximate nearest-neighbor search. A variable number of stored interests does not mean all are queried: the described retrieval samples three medoids. Oracle comparisons inspect future actions and are not a deployable predictor; empirical engagement gains do not establish complete understanding of user interests.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Aditya Pal; Chantat Eksombatchai; Yitong Zhou; Bo Zhao; Charles Rosenberg; Jure Leskovec
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
PinnerSage: multiple medoid interests for personalized retrieval
Clustered user actions in a fixed pin-embedding space with hierarchical Ward clustering, represented each cluster by a medoid and sampled important medoids for retrieval using daily and online updates.
Scientific scope
Uses existing PinSage embeddings, Ward clustering and approximate nearest-neighbor search. A variable number of stored interests does not mean all are queried: the described retrieval samples three medoids. Oracle comparisons inspect future actions and are not a deployable predictor; empirical engagement gains do not establish complete understanding of user interests.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Aditya Pal; Chantat Eksombatchai; Yitong Zhou; Bo Zhao; Charles Rosenberg; Jure Leskovec
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.