What is recorded here?
Generated roughly30thousand wing-geometry/inflow RANS simulations with surface and volume fields and evaluated learned surrogates for held-out geometry/condition lift-drag tradeoffs.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
Inherits OpenFOAM RANS, Transolver and AB-UPT. Simulated high-fidelity labels are not direct numerical resolution of all turbulence or wind-tunnel truth. Specific NACA-profile parameter ranges and held-out splits do not imply arbitrary aircraft generalization or certified optimal design.
Read the original work
- Going with the Speed of Sound: Pushing Neural Surrogates into Highly-turbulent Transonic Regimes
- Mistral research publications index
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Fabian Paischer; Leo Cotteleer; Yann Dreze; Richard Kurle; Dylan Rubini; Maurits Bleeker; Tobias Kronlachner; Johannes Brandstetter
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Emmi-Wing: three-dimensional transonic CFD benchmark
Generated roughly30thousand wing-geometry/inflow RANS simulations with surface and volume fields and evaluated learned surrogates for held-out geometry/condition lift-drag tradeoffs.
Scientific scope
Inherits OpenFOAM RANS, Transolver and AB-UPT. Simulated high-fidelity labels are not direct numerical resolution of all turbulence or wind-tunnel truth. Specific NACA-profile parameter ranges and held-out splits do not imply arbitrary aircraft generalization or certified optimal design.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Fabian Paischer; Leo Cotteleer; Yann Dreze; Richard Kurle; Dylan Rubini; Maurits Bleeker; Tobias Kronlachner; Johannes Brandstetter
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.