WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Physics · Source-linked note

Electron parity controls charge addition to a superconducting island

Lafarge, Joyez and colleagues used Coulomb-blockade electrometry to measure how electron-number parity changes the free energy of a small superconducting island. In one device, unequal widths of successive charge steps gave the temperature-dependent cost of an unpaired electron. A later device with a larger superconducting gap relative to its charging energy showed charge steps of two electrons at low temperature and field; increasing either restored intermediate or single-electron steps.

Read original sources · Check the exact scope · Choose a next step

What is recorded here?

Lafarge, Joyez and colleagues used Coulomb-blockade electrometry to measure how electron-number parity changes the free energy of a small superconducting island. In one device, unequal widths of successive charge steps gave the temperature-dependent cost of an unpaired electron. A later device with a larger superconducting gap relative to its charging energy showed charge steps of two electrons at low temperature and field; increasing either restored intermediate or single-electron steps.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

The two experiments used different samples and charging regimes. Two-electron periodicity alone does not establish two-electron charge quantization. The inference relies on calibrated mean-charge measurements, weak tunnelling and equilibrium models; low-temperature deviations and a fitted mean-free-path discrepancy retain their source-level uncertainty. These observations do not demonstrate an operating Cooper-pair pump, a coherent qubit or universal parity protection. The cited manuscripts are reproduced in a 1993 thesis; their wording may differ from the journal versions.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

P. Lafarge; P. Joyez; D. Esteve; C. Urbina; M. H. Devoret

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

Electron parity controls charge addition to a superconducting island

Lafarge, Joyez and colleagues used Coulomb-blockade electrometry to measure how electron-number parity changes the free energy of a small superconducting island. In one device, unequal widths of successive charge steps gave the temperature-dependent cost of an unpaired electron. A later device with a larger superconducting gap relative to its charging energy showed charge steps of two electrons at low temperature and field; increasing either restored intermediate or single-electron steps.

Scientific scope

The two experiments used different samples and charging regimes. Two-electron periodicity alone does not establish two-electron charge quantization. The inference relies on calibrated mean-charge measurements, weak tunnelling and equilibrium models; low-temperature deviations and a fitted mean-free-path discrepancy retain their source-level uncertainty. These observations do not demonstrate an operating Cooper-pair pump, a coherent qubit or universal parity protection. The cited manuscripts are reproduced in a 1993 thesis; their wording may differ from the journal versions.

Reading status

This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.

People and systems

P. Lafarge; P. Joyez; D. Esteve; C. Urbina; M. H. Devoret

These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.

Original sources