WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Computing & AI · Source-linked note

Kuhn: solve the whole assignment, with a certificate

Kuhn combines bipartite matching and an adequate-budget dual certificate into a finite method for maximum-score one-to-one assignment with positive integer ratings, supplying explicit transfer and budget-improvement routines.

What is recorded here?

Kuhn combines bipartite matching and an adequate-budget dual certificate into a finite method for maximum-score one-to-one assignment with positive integer ratings, supplying explicit transfer and budget-improvement routines. Choosing the best worker for each job separately can assign the same person twice and miss the best overall arrangement. Kuhn instead treats the whole assignment together. A budget attached to every person and job gives an upper bound on any complete assignment; an assignment that exactly meets this budget is therefore optimal. His method alternates between improving a matching along transfers and changing the budget to create new eligible pairs. It turns ideas from graph theory and optimization duality into an explicit solution procedure, rather than checking every possible assignment. The original paper includes proofs, routines and a worked example; later implementations and complexity improvements remain separate work.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

The method solves the finite assignment problem under the stated cost and matching model. Dual potentials and admissible augmentations are essential. Original algorithmic presentation and later polynomial implementations have different complexity accounts. This is not a solver for arbitrary generalized scheduling or transportation constraints; earlier Kőnig/Egerváry work retains credit.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

Harold W. Kuhn

Source-listed contributors to this scoped work. Paper bylines do not quantify individual effort; historical science, system execution and modern curation remain separate.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

Kuhn: solve the whole assignment, with a certificate

Kuhn combines bipartite matching and an adequate-budget dual certificate into a finite method for maximum-score one-to-one assignment with positive integer ratings, supplying explicit transfer and budget-improvement routines.

Choosing the best worker for each job separately can assign the same person twice and miss the best overall arrangement. Kuhn instead treats the whole assignment together. A budget attached to every person and job gives an upper bound on any complete assignment; an assignment that exactly meets this budget is therefore optimal. His method alternates between improving a matching along transfers and changing the budget to create new eligible pairs. It turns ideas from graph theory and optimization duality into an explicit solution procedure, rather than checking every possible assignment. The original paper includes proofs, routines and a worked example; later implementations and complexity improvements remain separate work.

Scientific scope

The method solves the finite assignment problem under the stated cost and matching model. Dual potentials and admissible augmentations are essential. Original algorithmic presentation and later polynomial implementations have different complexity accounts. This is not a solver for arbitrary generalized scheduling or transportation constraints; earlier Kőnig/Egerváry work retains credit.

People and systems

Harold W. Kuhn

Original sources