What is recorded here?
Exhibited convex failure cases for naive sign compression and used stored compression residuals in future updates, analyzing error-feedback SGD and scaled sign variants.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
Inherits earlier error-feedback implementations and convex analyses; contribution is broader corrective analysis/counterexamples, not invention of all feedback. Positive rates require a delta-approximate compressor, unbiased bounded-moment stochastic gradients and stated smoothness/convexity assumptions. Compression terms remain in higher-order smooth bounds and leading nonsmooth bounds; not arbitrary broken compressors or literally free computation/communication.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Sai Praneeth Karimireddy; Quentin Rebjock; Sebastian U. Stich; Martin Jaggi
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Error-feedback SGD: biased-compression counterexamples and residual correction
Exhibited convex failure cases for naive sign compression and used stored compression residuals in future updates, analyzing error-feedback SGD and scaled sign variants.
Scientific scope
Inherits earlier error-feedback implementations and convex analyses; contribution is broader corrective analysis/counterexamples, not invention of all feedback. Positive rates require a delta-approximate compressor, unbiased bounded-moment stochastic gradients and stated smoothness/convexity assumptions. Compression terms remain in higher-order smooth bounds and leading nonsmooth bounds; not arbitrary broken compressors or literally free computation/communication.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Sai Praneeth Karimireddy; Quentin Rebjock; Sebastian U. Stich; Martin Jaggi
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.