What is recorded here?
Collected programming problems at introductory, interview and competition levels, standardized call-based and standard-input formats, and evaluated generated Python using problem-specific test cases.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
The original 10,000 problems split evenly into training and test sets. Passing some test cases differs from solving a complete problem. Executable tests do not prove general program correctness or software security.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Dan Hendrycks; Steven Basart; Saurav Kadavath; Mantas Mazeika; Akul Arora; Ethan Guo; Collin Burns; Samir Puranik; Horace He; Dawn Song; Jacob Steinhardt
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
APPS: executable evaluation of programming-challenge solutions
Collected programming problems at introductory, interview and competition levels, standardized call-based and standard-input formats, and evaluated generated Python using problem-specific test cases.
Scientific scope
The original 10,000 problems split evenly into training and test sets. Passing some test cases differs from solving a complete problem. Executable tests do not prove general program correctness or software security.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Dan Hendrycks; Steven Basart; Saurav Kadavath; Mantas Mazeika; Akul Arora; Ethan Guo; Collin Burns; Samir Puranik; Horace He; Dawn Song; Jacob Steinhardt
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.