What is recorded here?
Trained the 1.3B-parameter phi-1 code model using selected web data and synthetic textbook-style material, reporting strong Python coding benchmark results for its size and training budget.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
The paper evaluates a coding-focused model on specified benchmarks; it does not show that curated or synthetic data alone is sufficient for all language-model capabilities. Reported benchmark scores are author results, not independently replicated here.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Suriya Gunasekar; Yi Zhang; Jyoti Aneja; Caio César Teodoro Mendes; Allie Del Giorno; Sivakanth Gopi; Mojan Javaheripi; Piero Kauffmann; Gustavo de Rosa; Olli Saarikivi; Adil Salim; Shital Shah; Harkirat Singh Behl; Xin Wang; Sébastien Bubeck; Ronen Eldan; Adam Tauman Kalai; Yin Tat Lee; Yuanzhi Li
Complete named paper byline. Human research, source-reported system execution and experimental validation are distinct; individual effort shares are not measured.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Gunasekar and colleagues: textbook-quality data and phi-1
Trained the 1.3B-parameter phi-1 code model using selected web data and synthetic textbook-style material, reporting strong Python coding benchmark results for its size and training budget.
Scientific scope
The paper evaluates a coding-focused model on specified benchmarks; it does not show that curated or synthetic data alone is sufficient for all language-model capabilities. Reported benchmark scores are author results, not independently replicated here.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Suriya Gunasekar; Yi Zhang; Jyoti Aneja; Caio César Teodoro Mendes; Allie Del Giorno; Sivakanth Gopi; Mojan Javaheripi; Piero Kauffmann; Gustavo de Rosa; Olli Saarikivi; Adil Salim; Shital Shah; Harkirat Singh Behl; Xin Wang; Sébastien Bubeck; Ronen Eldan; Adam Tauman Kalai; Yin Tat Lee; Yuanzhi Li
Complete named paper byline. Human research, source-reported system execution and experimental validation are distinct; individual effort shares are not measured.