WRSWorld Research StateContribute
My reading

Computing & AI · Source-linked note

IQA: asking questions that require an agent to look and act

“Is there an apple in the refrigerator?” cannot always be answered from the first camera image. The agent may need to move, open the door and remember what it saw. Gordon and colleagues introduce an interactive question-answering task and a hierarchical system that divides planning, navigation, detection, manipulation and answering. A spatial memory stores observations at locations rather than forcing a single recurrent state to remember everything. Their IQADATA resource supplies automatically generated existence, counting and spatial-relation questions in simulated kitchens. The contribution combines this task design with the specific memory and controller architecture, without separately counting the underlying AI2-THOR engine.

Read original sources · Check the exact scope · Choose a next step

What is recorded here?

“Is there an apple in the refrigerator?” cannot always be answered from the first camera image. The agent may need to move, open the door and remember what it saw. Gordon and colleagues introduce an interactive question-answering task and a hierarchical system that divides planning, navigation, detection, manipulation and answering. A spatial memory stores observations at locations rather than forcing a single recurrent state to remember everything. Their IQADATA resource supplies automatically generated existence, counting and spatial-relation questions in simulated kitchens. The contribution combines this task design with the specific memory and controller architecture, without separately counting the underlying AI2-THOR engine.

Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.

Scientific scope

The original split uses 25 training kitchens and five test kitchens; questions follow templates rather than unrestricted human conversation. Training uses simulator-provided supervision, and some reported results additionally use ideal detections or navigation. Those results must be distinguished from learned-perception results. The learned system does not outperform simple answer-frequency guessing on every question type. No real-house robot experiment or general language-understanding guarantee is established.

Read the original work

This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.

Optional · put your agent to work

Build on this exact record

Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.

Draft a question from this record

The draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.

See an example before starting · Suggest a correction

People and systems

Daniel Gordon; Aniruddha Kembhavi; Mohammad Rastegari; Joseph Redmon; Dieter Fox; Ali Farhadi

Source-listed human researchers and engineers for the exact method or resource. The evaluated learning system is not an independently attested scientific author. Earlier methods, funding and data-collection roles remain separate. Individual effort shares and unresolved person identities are not inferred.

Research locations and affiliations

Location not yet established

This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.

English catalogue narrative

IQA: asking questions that require an agent to look and act

“Is there an apple in the refrigerator?” cannot always be answered from the first camera image. The agent may need to move, open the door and remember what it saw. Gordon and colleagues introduce an interactive question-answering task and a hierarchical system that divides planning, navigation, detection, manipulation and answering. A spatial memory stores observations at locations rather than forcing a single recurrent state to remember everything. Their IQADATA resource supplies automatically generated existence, counting and spatial-relation questions in simulated kitchens. The contribution combines this task design with the specific memory and controller architecture, without separately counting the underlying AI2-THOR engine.

Scientific scope

The original split uses 25 training kitchens and five test kitchens; questions follow templates rather than unrestricted human conversation. Training uses simulator-provided supervision, and some reported results additionally use ideal detections or navigation. Those results must be distinguished from learned-perception results. The learned system does not outperform simple answer-frequency guessing on every question type. No real-house robot experiment or general language-understanding guarantee is established.

Reading status

This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.

People and systems

Daniel Gordon; Aniruddha Kembhavi; Mohammad Rastegari; Joseph Redmon; Dieter Fox; Ali Farhadi

Source-listed human researchers and engineers for the exact method or resource. The evaluated learning system is not an independently attested scientific author. Earlier methods, funding and data-collection roles remain separate. Individual effort shares and unresolved person identities are not inferred.

Original sources