What is recorded here?
Giustina and colleagues reported a violation of a Bell inequality using entangled photons, rapid setting choices and high-efficiency transition-edge detectors in a Vienna experiment. The analysis reported a local-realism p-value no greater than 3.74 × 10⁻³¹ under its stated statistical and predictability assumptions.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
The source measures photons at stations about 58 m apart and uses locally defined trials and detection windows; its spacelike separation depends on calibrated timing and the assumption that the measurement outcome is fixed at photon absorption. Random-setting independence is an assumption, not an experimentally complete exclusion of every hidden-variable explanation. The small p-value concerns the specified local-realism hypothesis and does not eliminate systematic or human errors. Supplementary timing and statistical derivations and raw data have not been replayed.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Marissa Giustina; Marijn A. M. Versteegh; Sören Wengerowsky; Johannes Handsteiner; Armin Hochrainer; Kevin Phelan; Fabian Steinlechner; Johannes Kofler; Jan-Åke Larsson; Carlos Abellán; Waldimar Amaya; Valerio Pruneri; Morgan W. Mitchell; Jörn Beyer; Thomas Gerrits; Adriana E. Lita; Lynden K. Shalm; Sae Woo Nam; Thomas Scheidl; Rupert Ursin; Bernhard Wittmann; Anton Zeilinger
These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Vienna entangled-photon Bell test with spacelike separation
Giustina and colleagues reported a violation of a Bell inequality using entangled photons, rapid setting choices and high-efficiency transition-edge detectors in a Vienna experiment. The analysis reported a local-realism p-value no greater than 3.74 × 10⁻³¹ under its stated statistical and predictability assumptions.
Scientific scope
The source measures photons at stations about 58 m apart and uses locally defined trials and detection windows; its spacelike separation depends on calibrated timing and the assumption that the measurement outcome is fixed at photon absorption. Random-setting independence is an assumption, not an experimentally complete exclusion of every hidden-variable explanation. The small p-value concerns the specified local-realism hypothesis and does not eliminate systematic or human errors. Supplementary timing and statistical derivations and raw data have not been replayed.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Marissa Giustina; Marijn A. M. Versteegh; Sören Wengerowsky; Johannes Handsteiner; Armin Hochrainer; Kevin Phelan; Fabian Steinlechner; Johannes Kofler; Jan-Åke Larsson; Carlos Abellán; Waldimar Amaya; Valerio Pruneri; Morgan W. Mitchell; Jörn Beyer; Thomas Gerrits; Adriana E. Lita; Lynden K. Shalm; Sae Woo Nam; Thomas Scheidl; Rupert Ursin; Bernhard Wittmann; Anton Zeilinger
These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.