What is recorded here?
Applied preference modeling and RLHF to helpful/harmless assistants and iterated online human feedback with regularly refreshed preference and policy models, studying capability compatibility and reward–KL behavior.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
RLHF and preference learning predate this study. Helpfulness/harmlessness depend on annotator criteria and prompts, not certified safety. Empirical reward/KL relationships are scoped to tested settings; ConstitutionalAI/RLAIF is a separate later contribution.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Yuntao Bai; Andy Jones; Kamal Ndousse; Amanda Askell; Anna Chen; Nova DasSarma; Dawn Drain; Stanislav Fort; Deep Ganguli; Tom Henighan; Nicholas Joseph; Saurav Kadavath; Jackson Kernion; Tom Conerly; Sheer El-Showk; Nelson Elhage; Zac Hatfield-Dodds; Danny Hernandez; Tristan Hume; Scott Johnston; Shauna Kravec; Liane Lovitt; Neel Nanda; Catherine Olsson; Dario Amodei; Tom Brown; Jack Clark; Sam McCandlish; Chris Olah; Ben Mann; Jared Kaplan
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Bai et al.: iterated helpful-and-harmless preference training
Applied preference modeling and RLHF to helpful/harmless assistants and iterated online human feedback with regularly refreshed preference and policy models, studying capability compatibility and reward–KL behavior.
Scientific scope
RLHF and preference learning predate this study. Helpfulness/harmlessness depend on annotator criteria and prompts, not certified safety. Empirical reward/KL relationships are scoped to tested settings; ConstitutionalAI/RLAIF is a separate later contribution.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Yuntao Bai; Andy Jones; Kamal Ndousse; Amanda Askell; Anna Chen; Nova DasSarma; Dawn Drain; Stanislav Fort; Deep Ganguli; Tom Henighan; Nicholas Joseph; Saurav Kadavath; Jackson Kernion; Tom Conerly; Sheer El-Showk; Nelson Elhage; Zac Hatfield-Dodds; Danny Hernandez; Tristan Hume; Scott Johnston; Shauna Kravec; Liane Lovitt; Neel Nanda; Catherine Olsson; Dario Amodei; Tom Brown; Jack Clark; Sam McCandlish; Chris Olah; Ben Mann; Jared Kaplan
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.