What is recorded here?
Introduces model-parameter and data-label randomization tests for explanation methods, revealing that some visually persuasive saliency procedures can ignore learned model or label structure.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
Sensitivity to these tests is a necessary task-dependent diagnostic, not sufficient proof of explanation correctness. Invariance findings are scoped to tested methods, metrics and architectures; signed and absolute visualizations can behave differently. Star denotes Google residency, not equal contribution.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Julius Adebayo; Justin Gilmer; Michael Muelly; Ian Goodfellow; Moritz Hardt; Been Kim
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Saliency sanity checks by parameter and label randomization
Introduces model-parameter and data-label randomization tests for explanation methods, revealing that some visually persuasive saliency procedures can ignore learned model or label structure.
Scientific scope
Sensitivity to these tests is a necessary task-dependent diagnostic, not sufficient proof of explanation correctness. Invariance findings are scoped to tested methods, metrics and architectures; signed and absolute visualizations can behave differently. Star denotes Google residency, not equal contribution.
Reading status
This is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.
People and systems
Julius Adebayo; Justin Gilmer; Michael Muelly; Ian Goodfellow; Moritz Hardt; Been Kim
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.