What is recorded here?
Replaces contraction-constrained graph recurrence with GRU-style finite unrolling and backpropagation, and carries node annotations across graph-based output steps.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
The method uses a finite sequence of recurrent graph updates, rather than requiring convergence to a fixed point. More unrolled steps require more memory; successful benchmark predictions do not prove arbitrary program correctness.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Yujia Li; Richard Zemel; Marc Brockschmidt; Daniel Tarlow
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Gated Graph Neural Networks and graph-sequence outputs
Replaces contraction-constrained graph recurrence with GRU-style finite unrolling and backpropagation, and carries node annotations across graph-based output steps.
Scientific scope
The method uses a finite sequence of recurrent graph updates, rather than requiring convergence to a fixed point. More unrolled steps require more memory; successful benchmark predictions do not prove arbitrary program correctness.
People and systems
Yujia Li; Richard Zemel; Marc Brockschmidt; Daniel Tarlow