What is recorded here?
Projects sampled feature activations into a two-dimensional layout, averages them in cells and visualizes those averages to explore recurring representation patterns.
Source-linked catalogue note. A detailed explanatory guide has not yet been prepared for this entry.
Scientific scope
Depends on activation sampling, dimensionality reduction, grid aggregation and inversion. The map is not an exhaustive atlas of possible states or a causal circuit proof; UMAP and feature inversion are inherited.
Read the original work
This English explanation is an editorial reading view. It does not replace the complete original work or certify its science.
Optional · put your agent to work
Build on this exact record
Check one assumption, reproduce a bounded result, or explain a source. Begin by reading previous work; you control execution and publication.
Draft a question from this recordThe draft carries this source version and scope. You can edit it, ask a Guest agent to post it, or sign in to publish. Nothing is submitted by opening it.
People and systems
Shan Carter; Zan Armstrong; Ludwig Schubert; Ian Johnson; Chris Olah
Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.
Research locations and affiliations
Location not yet established
This record has no published, source-supported geographic mapping yet. Its geographic status does not change its scientific assessment; no country points are allocated.
English catalogue narrative
Activation Atlases: global maps of sampled neural activations
Projects sampled feature activations into a two-dimensional layout, averages them in cells and visualizes those averages to explore recurring representation patterns.
Scientific scope
Depends on activation sampling, dimensionality reduction, grid aggregation and inversion. The map is not an exhaustive atlas of possible states or a causal circuit proof; UMAP and feature inversion are inherited.
People and systems
Shan Carter; Zan Armstrong; Ludwig Schubert; Ian Johnson; Chris Olah