{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "wahl-juno-jupiter-gravity-dilute-core-models-2017",
    "title": "Juno gravity motivates model-dependent Jupiter interior profiles with a dilute core",
    "summary": "Wahl and colleagues compared numerical interior structure models against Jupiter’s even gravitational moments from Juno’s first two close orbits. In their model families an extended heavy-element-enriched core, mixed with hydrogen and helium, can improve agreement with the measurements; the authors explored how equations of state and envelope composition change the inferred core and gravitational moments.",
    "boundary": "This is a model-based interpretation of existing Juno measurements, not direct imaging of a core or proof that it must be dilute. The paper finds compact-core solutions with a different equation of state or perturbed model; the tested reference model remains discrepant, and matching the gravity data can require changes to outer-envelope density or composition. Dynamic wind contributions increase the effective uncertainty. The abstract reports 7–25 Earth masses of heavy elements in the core while the body describes an approximate 6–25 bracket, so no sharper universal interval is claimed. Hydrogen-helium equation of state, assumed equilibrium, temperature/composition profiles and core erosion history are material limitations. Distinct later 2018 deep-jet inversion and 2021 vortex depth papers remain unverified HOLDs, not resolved by this source.",
    "area": "Planetary physics and gravitation",
    "topic": "Physics",
    "year": 2017,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "THEORY",
    "package_id": "wahl-juno-jupiter-gravity-dilute-core-models-2017",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:c1f15d8a-fc09-440c-a335-68a67e90f69f",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:f95bc37fe8e1fc641ff51073c162b89a52d689f7616403793815e0e3e35bf825"
    },
    "humans": [
      "S. M. Wahl",
      "W. B. Hubbard",
      "B. Militzer",
      "T. Guillot",
      "Y. Miguel",
      "N. Movshovitz",
      "Y. Kaspi",
      "R. Helled",
      "D. Reese",
      "E. Galanti",
      "S. Levin",
      "J. E. Connerney",
      "S. J. Bolton"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "wahl-juno-jupiter-interior-dilute-core-2017-v1",
        "title": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1",
        "date": "2017-07-07"
      }
    ],
    "points": "85000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "wahl-juno-jupiter-gravity-dilute-core-models-2017",
      "entry_id": "wahl-juno-jupiter-gravity-dilute-core-models-2017",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": "-",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:c1f15d8a-fc09-440c-a335-68a67e90f69f",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:f95bc37fe8e1fc641ff51073c162b89a52d689f7616403793815e0e3e35bf825"
      },
      "what_changed": "Wahl and colleagues compared numerical interior structure models against Jupiter’s even gravitational moments from Juno’s first two close orbits. In their model families an extended heavy-element-enriched core, mixed with hydrogen and helium, can improve agreement with the measurements; the authors explored how equations of state and envelope composition change the inferred core and gravitational moments.",
      "scope": "Wahl and colleagues compared numerical interior structure models against Jupiter’s even gravitational moments from Juno’s first two close orbits. In their model families an extended heavy-element-enriched core, mixed with hydrogen and helium, can improve agreement with the measurements; the authors explored how equations of state and envelope composition change the inferred core and gravitational moments. This is a model-based interpretation of existing Juno measurements, not direct imaging of a core or proof that it must be dilute. The paper finds compact-core solutions with a different equation of state or perturbed model; the tested reference model remains discrepant, and matching the gravity data can require changes to outer-envelope density or composition. Dynamic wind contributions increase the effective uncertainty. The abstract reports 7–25 Earth masses of heavy elements in the core while the body describes an approximate 6–25 bracket, so no sharper universal interval is claimed. Hydrogen-helium equation of state, assumed equilibrium, temperature/composition profiles and core erosion history are material limitations. Distinct later 2018 deep-jet inversion and 2021 vortex depth papers remain unverified HOLDs, not resolved by this source.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:c1f15d8a-fc09-440c-a335-68a67e90f69f",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:f95bc37fe8e1fc641ff51073c162b89a52d689f7616403793815e0e3e35bf825"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-28T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "S. M. Wahl",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "W. B. Hubbard",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "B. Militzer",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "T. Guillot",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Y. Miguel",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "N. Movshovitz",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Y. Kaspi",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "R. Helled",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "D. Reese",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "E. Galanti",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "S. Levin",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "J. E. Connerney",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "S. J. Bolton",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "This is a model-based interpretation of existing Juno measurements, not direct imaging of a core or proof that it must be dilute. The paper finds compact-core solutions with a different equation of state or perturbed model; the tested reference model remains discrepant, and matching the gravity data can require changes to outer-envelope density or composition. Dynamic wind contributions increase the effective uncertainty. The abstract reports 7–25 Earth masses of heavy elements in the core while the body describes an approximate 6–25 bracket, so no sharper universal interval is claimed. Hydrogen-helium equation of state, assumed equilibrium, temperature/composition profiles and core erosion history are material limitations. Distinct later 2018 deep-jet inversion and 2021 vortex depth papers remain unverified HOLDs, not resolved by this source.",
        "domain": "Planetary physics and gravitation"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Juno gravity motivates model-dependent Jupiter interior profiles with a dilute core\n\nWahl and colleagues compared numerical interior structure models against Jupiter’s even gravitational moments from Juno’s first two close orbits. In their model families an extended heavy-element-enriched core, mixed with hydrogen and helium, can improve agreement with the measurements; the authors explored how equations of state and envelope composition change the inferred core and gravitational moments.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThis is a model-based interpretation of existing Juno measurements, not direct imaging of a core or proof that it must be dilute. The paper finds compact-core solutions with a different equation of state or perturbed model; the tested reference model remains discrepant, and matching the gravity data can require changes to outer-envelope density or composition. Dynamic wind contributions increase the effective uncertainty. The abstract reports 7–25 Earth masses of heavy elements in the core while the body describes an approximate 6–25 bracket, so no sharper universal interval is claimed. Hydrogen-helium equation of state, assumed equilibrium, temperature/composition profiles and core erosion history are material limitations. Distinct later 2018 deep-jet inversion and 2021 vortex depth papers remain unverified HOLDs, not resolved by this source.\n\n## Reading status\n\nThis is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.\n\n## People and systems\n\nS. M. Wahl; W. B. Hubbard; B. Militzer; T. Guillot; Y. Miguel; N. Movshovitz; Y. Kaspi; R. Helled; D. Reese; E. Galanti; S. Levin; J. E. Connerney; S. J. Bolton\n\nThese are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.\n\n\n\n## Original sources\n\n- [Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1)\n",
      "summary": "Wahl and colleagues compared numerical interior structure models against Jupiter’s even gravitational moments from Juno’s first two close orbits. In their model families an extended heavy-element-enriched core, mixed with hydrogen and helium, can improve agreement with the measurements; the authors explored how equations of state and envelope composition change the inferred core and gravitational moments.",
      "title": "Juno gravity motivates model-dependent Jupiter interior profiles with a dilute core"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:c1f15d8a-fc09-440c-a335-68a67e90f69f",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:c1f15d8a-fc09-440c-a335-68a67e90f69f",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:f95bc37fe8e1fc641ff51073c162b89a52d689f7616403793815e0e3e35bf825"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:fd251dad70fd7ced02affe9f32eafd4a0189b18bca94a7df50ed1af8e4379d24"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:c1f15d8a-fc09-440c-a335-68a67e90f69f",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:f95bc37fe8e1fc641ff51073c162b89a52d689f7616403793815e0e3e35bf825"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "wahl-juno-jupiter-gravity-dilute-core-models-2017",
    "entry_id": "wahl-juno-jupiter-gravity-dilute-core-models-2017",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Juno gravity motivates model-dependent Jupiter interior profiles with a dilute core",
    "context": "Planetary physics and gravitation",
    "track": "Scoped theoretical result, model or research proposal",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": "-",
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-28",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-28",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Wahl and colleagues compared numerical interior structure models against Jupiter’s even gravitational moments from Juno’s first two close orbits. In their model families an extended heavy-element-enriched core, mixed with hydrogen and helium, can improve agreement with the measurements; the authors explored how equations of state and envelope composition change the inferred core and gravitational moments.",
    "scope": "Wahl and colleagues compared numerical interior structure models against Jupiter’s even gravitational moments from Juno’s first two close orbits. In their model families an extended heavy-element-enriched core, mixed with hydrogen and helium, can improve agreement with the measurements; the authors explored how equations of state and envelope composition change the inferred core and gravitational moments. This is a model-based interpretation of existing Juno measurements, not direct imaging of a core or proof that it must be dilute. The paper finds compact-core solutions with a different equation of state or perturbed model; the tested reference model remains discrepant, and matching the gravity data can require changes to outer-envelope density or composition. Dynamic wind contributions increase the effective uncertainty. The abstract reports 7–25 Earth masses of heavy elements in the core while the body describes an approximate 6–25 bracket, so no sharper universal interval is claimed. Hydrogen-helium equation of state, assumed equilibrium, temperature/composition profiles and core erosion history are material limitations. Distinct later 2018 deep-jet inversion and 2021 vortex depth papers remain unverified HOLDs, not resolved by this source.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. This is a model-based interpretation of existing Juno measurements, not direct imaging of a core or proof that it must be dilute. The paper finds compact-core solutions with a different equation of state or perturbed model; the tested reference model remains discrepant, and matching the gravity data can require changes to outer-envelope density or composition. Dynamic wind contributions increase the effective uncertainty. The abstract reports 7–25 Earth masses of heavy elements in the core while the body describes an approximate 6–25 bracket, so no sharper universal interval is claimed. Hydrogen-helium equation of state, assumed equilibrium, temperature/composition profiles and core erosion history are material limitations. Distinct later 2018 deep-jet inversion and 2021 vortex depth papers remain unverified HOLDs, not resolved by this source.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01997v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "The named authors in the research record",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:c1f15d8a-fc09-440c-a335-68a67e90f69f",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:f95bc37fe8e1fc641ff51073c162b89a52d689f7616403793815e0e3e35bf825"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "85000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": null,
  "reading_status": "SOURCE_LINKED_NOTE"
}