{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "shenker-stanford-black-hole-butterfly-shock-wave-2013",
    "title": "Black hole shock waves and sensitivity to early perturbations",
    "summary": "Shenker and Stanford used a two-sided holographic black hole model to connect a small early perturbation to a blueshifted gravitational shock wave and the loss of leading-order local correlations. In their BTZ calculation the onset time scales logarithmically with black hole entropy for a thermal-sized perturbation.",
    "boundary": "The central calculation assumes an eternal two-sided AdS black hole, classical Einstein gravity and the stated shell and holographic prescriptions. Vanishing mutual information is the leading large-N contribution for the considered intervals, not all correlations; finite spin-system numerics and string corrections are separate and limited. This is not an observed black hole, a proof of a universal chaos bound or a resolution of the firewall debate.",
    "area": "Quantum gravity and black holes",
    "topic": "Physics",
    "year": 2013,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "THEORY",
    "package_id": "shenker-stanford-black-hole-butterfly-shock-wave-2013",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:37998b8b-196d-4506-ae7c-4390e06a9bed",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:3d112341f3aed440205c2483c07fc086cd9880fe9f1e222f3155efa0a5a10ad6"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Stephen H. Shenker",
      "Douglas Stanford"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "shenker-stanford-1306-0622-v3",
        "title": "Black holes and the butterfly effect (arXiv 1306.0622v3)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0622v3",
        "date": "2014-04-21"
      }
    ],
    "points": "165000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "shenker-stanford-black-hole-butterfly-shock-wave-2013",
      "entry_id": "shenker-stanford-black-hole-butterfly-shock-wave-2013",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": "+",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:37998b8b-196d-4506-ae7c-4390e06a9bed",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:3d112341f3aed440205c2483c07fc086cd9880fe9f1e222f3155efa0a5a10ad6"
      },
      "what_changed": "Shenker and Stanford used a two-sided holographic black hole model to connect a small early perturbation to a blueshifted gravitational shock wave and the loss of leading-order local correlations. In their BTZ calculation the onset time scales logarithmically with black hole entropy for a thermal-sized perturbation.",
      "scope": "Shenker and Stanford used a two-sided holographic black hole model to connect a small early perturbation to a blueshifted gravitational shock wave and the loss of leading-order local correlations. In their BTZ calculation the onset time scales logarithmically with black hole entropy for a thermal-sized perturbation. The central calculation assumes an eternal two-sided AdS black hole, classical Einstein gravity and the stated shell and holographic prescriptions. Vanishing mutual information is the leading large-N contribution for the considered intervals, not all correlations; finite spin-system numerics and string corrections are separate and limited. This is not an observed black hole, a proof of a universal chaos bound or a resolution of the firewall debate.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:37998b8b-196d-4506-ae7c-4390e06a9bed",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:3d112341f3aed440205c2483c07fc086cd9880fe9f1e222f3155efa0a5a10ad6"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-28T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Stephen H. Shenker",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Black holes and the butterfly effect (arXiv 1306.0622v3)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0622v3"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Douglas Stanford",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Black holes and the butterfly effect (arXiv 1306.0622v3)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0622v3"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Black holes and the butterfly effect (arXiv 1306.0622v3)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0622v3"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "The central calculation assumes an eternal two-sided AdS black hole, classical Einstein gravity and the stated shell and holographic prescriptions. Vanishing mutual information is the leading large-N contribution for the considered intervals, not all correlations; finite spin-system numerics and string corrections are separate and limited. This is not an observed black hole, a proof of a universal chaos bound or a resolution of the firewall debate.",
        "domain": "Quantum gravity and black holes"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "Black holes and the butterfly effect (arXiv 1306.0622v3)",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0622v3"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Black hole shock waves and sensitivity to early perturbations\n\nShenker and Stanford used a two-sided holographic black hole model to connect a small early perturbation to a blueshifted gravitational shock wave and the loss of leading-order local correlations. In their BTZ calculation the onset time scales logarithmically with black hole entropy for a thermal-sized perturbation.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThe central calculation assumes an eternal two-sided AdS black hole, classical Einstein gravity and the stated shell and holographic prescriptions. Vanishing mutual information is the leading large-N contribution for the considered intervals, not all correlations; finite spin-system numerics and string corrections are separate and limited. This is not an observed black hole, a proof of a universal chaos bound or a resolution of the firewall debate.\n\n## Reading status\n\nThis is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.\n\n## People and systems\n\nStephen H. Shenker; Douglas Stanford\n\nThese are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.\n\n\n\n## Original sources\n\n- [Black holes and the butterfly effect (arXiv 1306.0622v3)](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0622v3)\n",
      "summary": "Shenker and Stanford used a two-sided holographic black hole model to connect a small early perturbation to a blueshifted gravitational shock wave and the loss of leading-order local correlations. In their BTZ calculation the onset time scales logarithmically with black hole entropy for a thermal-sized perturbation.",
      "title": "Black hole shock waves and sensitivity to early perturbations"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:37998b8b-196d-4506-ae7c-4390e06a9bed",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:37998b8b-196d-4506-ae7c-4390e06a9bed",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:3d112341f3aed440205c2483c07fc086cd9880fe9f1e222f3155efa0a5a10ad6"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:f53d5fa005dd23a7d36a863a647c2a4404b701d3ef923a304fd523534ac586f0"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:37998b8b-196d-4506-ae7c-4390e06a9bed",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:3d112341f3aed440205c2483c07fc086cd9880fe9f1e222f3155efa0a5a10ad6"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "shenker-stanford-black-hole-butterfly-shock-wave-2013",
    "entry_id": "shenker-stanford-black-hole-butterfly-shock-wave-2013",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Black hole shock waves and sensitivity to early perturbations",
    "context": "Quantum gravity and black holes",
    "track": "Scoped theoretical result, model or research proposal",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": "+",
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-28",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-28",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Shenker and Stanford used a two-sided holographic black hole model to connect a small early perturbation to a blueshifted gravitational shock wave and the loss of leading-order local correlations. In their BTZ calculation the onset time scales logarithmically with black hole entropy for a thermal-sized perturbation.",
    "scope": "Shenker and Stanford used a two-sided holographic black hole model to connect a small early perturbation to a blueshifted gravitational shock wave and the loss of leading-order local correlations. In their BTZ calculation the onset time scales logarithmically with black hole entropy for a thermal-sized perturbation. The central calculation assumes an eternal two-sided AdS black hole, classical Einstein gravity and the stated shell and holographic prescriptions. Vanishing mutual information is the leading large-N contribution for the considered intervals, not all correlations; finite spin-system numerics and string corrections are separate and limited. This is not an observed black hole, a proof of a universal chaos bound or a resolution of the firewall debate.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. The central calculation assumes an eternal two-sided AdS black hole, classical Einstein gravity and the stated shell and holographic prescriptions. Vanishing mutual information is the leading large-N contribution for the considered intervals, not all correlations; finite spin-system numerics and string corrections are separate and limited. This is not an observed black hole, a proof of a universal chaos bound or a resolution of the firewall debate.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Black holes and the butterfly effect (arXiv 1306.0622v3)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0622v3",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "The named authors in the research record",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:37998b8b-196d-4506-ae7c-4390e06a9bed",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:3d112341f3aed440205c2483c07fc086cd9880fe9f1e222f3155efa0a5a10ad6"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "165000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": null,
  "reading_status": "SOURCE_LINKED_NOTE"
}