{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "nist-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-uncertainty-stability",
    "title": "A highly stable aluminium-ion optical clock with quantified systematic uncertainty",
    "summary": "An aluminium-ion optical clock combined quantum-logic readout, a one-second interrogation enabled by a remote cavity-stabilized laser, and an improved trap and vacuum system. The authors report fractional systematic uncertainty of 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ and fractional instability of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶/√(τ/s), estimated by comparison with a strontium lattice clock.",
    "boundary": "The instability is a fitted comparison stability beyond the reported servo time, while 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ is the authors’ systematic uncertainty budget. In v1 the clock-operation passage says 26Mg+; v2 corrects that passage to 25Mg+, consistent with its abstract and supplement, but a separate v2 passage still says 27Mg+ for preparation/readout. The precise resolution of the residual inconsistent label remains unverified; avoid an unconditional isotope-specific claim. Their collision-shift figures differ slightly by rounding or version within the same manuscript: main text reports −(0.25 ± 0.36)×10⁻¹⁹ and the supplement reports −(0.26 ± 0.37)×10⁻¹⁹. Both are conditional estimates; no independent recalculation was performed.",
    "area": "Optical atomic clocks",
    "topic": "Physics",
    "year": 2025,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "EMPIRICAL",
    "package_id": "nist-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-uncertainty-stability",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:b3adb0b5-0c2f-49d2-a874-5d4db1afa6e1",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:22a967961a2f8e6bf8d700182e151d57b7ddd0e0d368c8449e0bd713e4a601a7"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Mason C. Marshall",
      "Daniel A. Rodriguez Castillo",
      "Willa J. Arthur-Dworschack",
      "Alexander Aeppli",
      "Kyungtae Kim",
      "Dahyeon Lee",
      "William Warfield",
      "J. Hinrichs",
      "Nicholas V. Nardelli",
      "Tara M. Fortier",
      "Jun Ye",
      "David R. Leibrandt",
      "David B. Hume"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "marshall-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-v1",
        "title": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1",
        "date": "2025-04-17"
      },
      {
        "id": "marshall-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-v2",
        "title": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty (version 2)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v2",
        "date": "2025-07-14"
      }
    ],
    "points": "165000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "nist-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-uncertainty-stability",
      "entry_id": "nist-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-uncertainty-stability",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": "+",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:b3adb0b5-0c2f-49d2-a874-5d4db1afa6e1",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:22a967961a2f8e6bf8d700182e151d57b7ddd0e0d368c8449e0bd713e4a601a7"
      },
      "what_changed": "An aluminium-ion optical clock combined quantum-logic readout, a one-second interrogation enabled by a remote cavity-stabilized laser, and an improved trap and vacuum system. The authors report fractional systematic uncertainty of 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ and fractional instability of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶/√(τ/s), estimated by comparison with a strontium lattice clock.",
      "scope": "An aluminium-ion optical clock combined quantum-logic readout, a one-second interrogation enabled by a remote cavity-stabilized laser, and an improved trap and vacuum system. The authors report fractional systematic uncertainty of 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ and fractional instability of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶/√(τ/s), estimated by comparison with a strontium lattice clock. The instability is a fitted comparison stability beyond the reported servo time, while 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ is the authors’ systematic uncertainty budget. In v1 the clock-operation passage says 26Mg+; v2 corrects that passage to 25Mg+, consistent with its abstract and supplement, but a separate v2 passage still says 27Mg+ for preparation/readout. The precise resolution of the residual inconsistent label remains unverified; avoid an unconditional isotope-specific claim. Their collision-shift figures differ slightly by rounding or version within the same manuscript: main text reports −(0.25 ± 0.36)×10⁻¹⁹ and the supplement reports −(0.26 ± 0.37)×10⁻¹⁹. Both are conditional estimates; no independent recalculation was performed.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:b3adb0b5-0c2f-49d2-a874-5d4db1afa6e1",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:22a967961a2f8e6bf8d700182e151d57b7ddd0e0d368c8449e0bd713e4a601a7"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-28T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Mason C. Marshall",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Daniel A. Rodriguez Castillo",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Willa J. Arthur-Dworschack",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Alexander Aeppli",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Kyungtae Kim",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Dahyeon Lee",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "William Warfield",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "J. Hinrichs",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Nicholas V. Nardelli",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Tara M. Fortier",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Jun Ye",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "David R. Leibrandt",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "David B. Hume",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-1",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty (version 2)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v2"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "The instability is a fitted comparison stability beyond the reported servo time, while 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ is the authors’ systematic uncertainty budget. In v1 the clock-operation passage says 26Mg+; v2 corrects that passage to 25Mg+, consistent with its abstract and supplement, but a separate v2 passage still says 27Mg+ for preparation/readout. The precise resolution of the residual inconsistent label remains unverified; avoid an unconditional isotope-specific claim. Their collision-shift figures differ slightly by rounding or version within the same manuscript: main text reports −(0.25 ± 0.36)×10⁻¹⁹ and the supplement reports −(0.26 ± 0.37)×10⁻¹⁹. Both are conditional estimates; no independent recalculation was performed.",
        "domain": "Optical atomic clocks"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1"
        },
        {
          "citation": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty (version 2)",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v2"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# A highly stable aluminium-ion optical clock with quantified systematic uncertainty\n\nAn aluminium-ion optical clock combined quantum-logic readout, a one-second interrogation enabled by a remote cavity-stabilized laser, and an improved trap and vacuum system. The authors report fractional systematic uncertainty of 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ and fractional instability of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶/√(τ/s), estimated by comparison with a strontium lattice clock.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThe instability is a fitted comparison stability beyond the reported servo time, while 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ is the authors’ systematic uncertainty budget. In v1 the clock-operation passage says 26Mg+; v2 corrects that passage to 25Mg+, consistent with its abstract and supplement, but a separate v2 passage still says 27Mg+ for preparation/readout. The precise resolution of the residual inconsistent label remains unverified; avoid an unconditional isotope-specific claim. Their collision-shift figures differ slightly by rounding or version within the same manuscript: main text reports −(0.25 ± 0.36)×10⁻¹⁹ and the supplement reports −(0.26 ± 0.37)×10⁻¹⁹. Both are conditional estimates; no independent recalculation was performed.\n\n## Reading status\n\nThis is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.\n\n## People and systems\n\nMason C. Marshall; Daniel A. Rodriguez Castillo; Willa J. Arthur-Dworschack; Alexander Aeppli; Kyungtae Kim; Dahyeon Lee; William Warfield; J. Hinrichs; Nicholas V. Nardelli; Tara M. Fortier; Jun Ye; David R. Leibrandt; David B. Hume\n\nThese are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.\n\n\n\n## Original sources\n\n- [High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1)\n- [High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty (version 2)](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v2)\n",
      "summary": "An aluminium-ion optical clock combined quantum-logic readout, a one-second interrogation enabled by a remote cavity-stabilized laser, and an improved trap and vacuum system. The authors report fractional systematic uncertainty of 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ and fractional instability of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶/√(τ/s), estimated by comparison with a strontium lattice clock.",
      "title": "A highly stable aluminium-ion optical clock with quantified systematic uncertainty"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:b3adb0b5-0c2f-49d2-a874-5d4db1afa6e1",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:b3adb0b5-0c2f-49d2-a874-5d4db1afa6e1",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:22a967961a2f8e6bf8d700182e151d57b7ddd0e0d368c8449e0bd713e4a601a7"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:71594a978e6695be82c63e86e22c685c151a25a3029122e5600e5dad98e4f099"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:b3adb0b5-0c2f-49d2-a874-5d4db1afa6e1",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:22a967961a2f8e6bf8d700182e151d57b7ddd0e0d368c8449e0bd713e4a601a7"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "nist-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-uncertainty-stability",
    "entry_id": "nist-aluminium-ion-clock-2025-uncertainty-stability",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "A highly stable aluminium-ion optical clock with quantified systematic uncertainty",
    "context": "Optical atomic clocks",
    "track": "Source-reported experimental result or reusable measurement method",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": "+",
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-28",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-28",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "An aluminium-ion optical clock combined quantum-logic readout, a one-second interrogation enabled by a remote cavity-stabilized laser, and an improved trap and vacuum system. The authors report fractional systematic uncertainty of 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ and fractional instability of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶/√(τ/s), estimated by comparison with a strontium lattice clock.",
    "scope": "An aluminium-ion optical clock combined quantum-logic readout, a one-second interrogation enabled by a remote cavity-stabilized laser, and an improved trap and vacuum system. The authors report fractional systematic uncertainty of 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ and fractional instability of 3.5 × 10⁻¹⁶/√(τ/s), estimated by comparison with a strontium lattice clock. The instability is a fitted comparison stability beyond the reported servo time, while 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ is the authors’ systematic uncertainty budget. In v1 the clock-operation passage says 26Mg+; v2 corrects that passage to 25Mg+, consistent with its abstract and supplement, but a separate v2 passage still says 27Mg+ for preparation/readout. The precise resolution of the residual inconsistent label remains unverified; avoid an unconditional isotope-specific claim. Their collision-shift figures differ slightly by rounding or version within the same manuscript: main text reports −(0.25 ± 0.36)×10⁻¹⁹ and the supplement reports −(0.26 ± 0.37)×10⁻¹⁹. Both are conditional estimates; no independent recalculation was performed.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. The instability is a fitted comparison stability beyond the reported servo time, while 5.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ is the authors’ systematic uncertainty budget. In v1 the clock-operation passage says 26Mg+; v2 corrects that passage to 25Mg+, consistent with its abstract and supplement, but a separate v2 passage still says 27Mg+ for preparation/readout. The precise resolution of the residual inconsistent label remains unverified; avoid an unconditional isotope-specific claim. Their collision-shift figures differ slightly by rounding or version within the same manuscript: main text reports −(0.25 ± 0.36)×10⁻¹⁹ and the supplement reports −(0.26 ± 0.37)×10⁻¹⁹. Both are conditional estimates; no independent recalculation was performed.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      },
      {
        "title": "High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5 × 10−19 Systematic Uncertainty (version 2)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13071v2",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "The named authors in the research record",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:b3adb0b5-0c2f-49d2-a874-5d4db1afa6e1",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:22a967961a2f8e6bf8d700182e151d57b7ddd0e0d368c8449e0bd713e4a601a7"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "165000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": null,
  "reading_status": "SOURCE_LINKED_NOTE"
}