{ "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1", "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177", "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS", "entry": { "id": "li-et-al-inference-time-intervention-2023", "title": "Li and colleagues: inference-time activation intervention for truthful answers", "summary": "Identified attention-head activation directions using truth-labeled examples and intervened during generation to improve measured truthfulness on TruthfulQA without retraining the base model.", "boundary": "Direction and head selection use supervision and access to internal activations. Improvements depend on intervention strength and may trade off helpfulness; performance on one benchmark does not establish a general truth detector.", "area": "Language-model representation control", "topic": "Artificial intelligence", "year": 2023, "lane": "HUMAN", "result": "ALGORITHM", "package_id": "li-et-al-inference-time-intervention-2023", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8d6f18442257ee794212ac767a5f3387c44ac0170bd6cddb03401f9e7c7cddd4" }, "humans": [ "Kenneth Li", "Oam Patel", "Fernanda Viégas", "Hanspeter Pfister", "Martin Wattenberg" ], "authors_complete": true, "human_role_note": "Source-listed authors for the exact contribution; experimental subjects are not autonomous scientific authors. Source support and predecessor work retain separate roles. Individual effort shares and unresolved identities are not inferred.", "agents": [], "related": [], "subresults": [], "scientific_assessment": { "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED", "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS", "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN", "provider_attestation": "NONE" }, "sources": [ { "id": "cur20261017-arxiv-2306-03341v1", "title": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1", "date": "2023-06-06" } ], "points": "45000", "published_grade": { "id": "li-et-al-inference-time-intervention-2023", "entry_id": "li-et-al-inference-time-intervention-2023", "band": "B", "modifier": "+", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8d6f18442257ee794212ac767a5f3387c44ac0170bd6cddb03401f9e7c7cddd4" }, "what_changed": "Identified attention-head activation directions using truth-labeled examples and intervened during generation to improve measured truthfulness on TruthfulQA without retraining the base model.", "scope": "Identified attention-head activation directions using truth-labeled examples and intervened during generation to improve measured truthfulness on TruthfulQA without retraining the base model. Direction and head selection use supervision and access to internal activations. Improvements depend on intervention strength and may trade off helpfulness; performance on one benchmark does not establish a general truth detector.", "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL", "scientific_correctness_certified": false }, "assessment_disposition": { "status": "ASSESSED", "label": "Provisionally assessed", "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8d6f18442257ee794212ac767a5f3387c44ac0170bd6cddb03401f9e7c7cddd4" }, "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177" } }, "version": { "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW", "previous": null, "published_at": "2026-10-23T00:00:00Z", "publisher": { "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33", "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION" }, "record": { "contributors": [ { "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED", "credit": "historical_scientific", "entity_kind": "historical_person", "name": "Kenneth Li", "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound", "roles": [ "formulator" ], "source": { "citation": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1" } }, { "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED", "credit": "historical_scientific", "entity_kind": "historical_person", "name": "Oam Patel", "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound", "roles": [ "formulator" ], "source": { "citation": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1" } }, { "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED", "credit": "historical_scientific", "entity_kind": "historical_person", "name": "Fernanda Viégas", "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound", "roles": [ "formulator" ], "source": { "citation": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1" } }, { "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED", "credit": "historical_scientific", "entity_kind": "historical_person", "name": "Hanspeter Pfister", "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound", "roles": [ "formulator" ], "source": { "citation": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1" } }, { "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED", "credit": "historical_scientific", "entity_kind": "historical_person", "name": "Martin Wattenberg", "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound", "roles": [ "formulator" ], "source": { "citation": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1" } } ], "evidence": [ { "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification", "id": "source-0", "kind": "source_reference", "source": { "citation": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1" } } ], "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY", "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1", "record_type": "research_note", "rrp_version": "0.1", "scope": { "description": "Direction and head selection use supervision and access to internal activations. Improvements depend on intervention strength and may trade off helpfulness; performance on one benchmark does not establish a general truth detector.", "domain": "Language-model representation control" }, "sources": [ { "citation": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1" } ], "statement": "# Li and colleagues: inference-time activation intervention for truthful answers\n\n## Can internal signals help recover a better answer?\n\nInference-Time Intervention identifies selected attention-head directions from truth-labeled examples and changes activations during generation. An attention head is one component of a transformer's information-processing mechanism. The original tests whether targeted changes improve answers on TruthfulQA, a particular benchmark of questions that can expose common mistaken beliefs.\n\n## The labels are part of the method\n\nUnlike an unsupervised consistency objective, this direction and head selection use labeled examples. That is a resource and an assumption, not a flaw to hide. Internal activation access is also required. A user of an ordinary hosted chatbot cannot assume the same intervention is available just because the method changes answers at inference time.\n\n## Keep the benchmark denominator visible\n\nImagine an invented test with twenty questions: a system improves from eight truthful answers to twelve. That is an increase from 40% to 60% on this test, or twenty percentage points. It does not mean every future answer has a 60% probability of being true. The actual research has its own dataset and evaluation; these classroom numbers are not its measurements. In an invented ten-question exercise, four correct answers before an intervention and six afterward would be a gain of twenty percentage points. That small count alone would not establish a reliable improvement: the selected questions, repeated trials and other changes still matter. Write down which answers changed and check them individually, rather than keeping only the nicer aggregate number.\n\n## Better truthfulness can have a cost\n\nThe original reports a tradeoff between measured truthfulness and helpfulness as intervention strength changes. Stronger steering is not automatically a better product. Benchmark results also do not prove the existence of a universal truth detector. The credited contribution is the supervised attention-head intervention and its bounded evidence, rather than every later truthfulness or activation-steering result.\n\n## A practical reading task\n\nCreate a small comparison table for the paper's intervention settings: what is optimized, what is measured and what gets worse. Preserve unknown costs or untested models as unknown. Someone choosing a method needs these tradeoffs more than a single impressive percentage. Reading and checking this table is possible before attempting an expensive replication.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nDirection and head selection use supervision and access to internal activations. Improvements depend on intervention strength and may trade off helpfulness; performance on one benchmark does not establish a general truth detector.\n\n## Sources for this explanation\n\n- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1): Pinned original contribution and stated hypotheses or experimental limits.\n", "summary": "Identified attention-head activation directions using truth-labeled examples and intervened during generation to improve measured truthfulness on TruthfulQA without retraining the base model.", "title": "Li and colleagues: inference-time activation intervention for truthful answers" }, "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "source_ref": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8d6f18442257ee794212ac767a5f3387c44ac0170bd6cddb03401f9e7c7cddd4" }, "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1", "public_view_hash": "sha256:d60ae40b0c2af97d46c079f0da4be372e6fef9389bbde2f5dfe34057eda350c1" }, "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8d6f18442257ee794212ac767a5f3387c44ac0170bd6cddb03401f9e7c7cddd4" }, "published_grade": { "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1", "edition": "2026-10-28.1", "id": "li-et-al-inference-time-intervention-2023", "entry_id": "li-et-al-inference-time-intervention-2023", "revision": 1, "title": "Li and colleagues: inference-time activation intervention for truthful answers", "context": "Language-model representation control", "track": "Human-designed model analysis or safeguard method", "band": "B", "modifier": "+", "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL", "assessed_on": "2026-10-23", "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-23", "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT", "what_changed": "Identified attention-head activation directions using truth-labeled examples and intervened during generation to improve measured truthfulness on TruthfulQA without retraining the base model.", "scope": "Identified attention-head activation directions using truth-labeled examples and intervened during generation to improve measured truthfulness on TruthfulQA without retraining the base model. Direction and head selection use supervision and access to internal activations. Improvements depend on intervention strength and may trade off helpfulness; performance on one benchmark does not establish a general truth detector.", "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. Direction and head selection use supervision and access to internal activations. Improvements depend on intervention strength and may trade off helpfulness; performance on one benchmark does not establish a general truth detector.", "references": [ { "title": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1", "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained." } ], "roles": [ { "who": "The named authors in the research record", "credit": "SCIENCE", "did": "Source-listed authors for the exact contribution; experimental subjects are not autonomous scientific authors. Source support and predecessor work retain separate roles. Individual effort shares and unresolved identities are not inferred." } ], "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8d6f18442257ee794212ac767a5f3387c44ac0170bd6cddb03401f9e7c7cddd4" }, "scientific_correctness_certified": false, "independent_expert_calibration": false, "method": "PROPRIETARY", "points": "45000" }, "canonical_agent_submission": false, "scientific_verification_awarded": false, "reader_guide": { "id": "li-et-al-inference-time-intervention-2023", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:e69eb77c-8695-48ce-a50a-41513f6f4413", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8d6f18442257ee794212ac767a5f3387c44ac0170bd6cddb03401f9e7c7cddd4" }, "sections": [ { "title": "Can internal signals help recover a better answer?", "text": "Inference-Time Intervention identifies selected attention-head directions from truth-labeled examples and changes activations during generation. An attention head is one component of a transformer's information-processing mechanism. The original tests whether targeted changes improve answers on TruthfulQA, a particular benchmark of questions that can expose common mistaken beliefs." }, { "title": "The labels are part of the method", "text": "Unlike an unsupervised consistency objective, this direction and head selection use labeled examples. That is a resource and an assumption, not a flaw to hide. Internal activation access is also required. A user of an ordinary hosted chatbot cannot assume the same intervention is available just because the method changes answers at inference time." }, { "title": "Keep the benchmark denominator visible", "text": "Imagine an invented test with twenty questions: a system improves from eight truthful answers to twelve. That is an increase from 40% to 60% on this test, or twenty percentage points. It does not mean every future answer has a 60% probability of being true. The actual research has its own dataset and evaluation; these classroom numbers are not its measurements. In an invented ten-question exercise, four correct answers before an intervention and six afterward would be a gain of twenty percentage points. That small count alone would not establish a reliable improvement: the selected questions, repeated trials and other changes still matter. Write down which answers changed and check them individually, rather than keeping only the nicer aggregate number." }, { "title": "Better truthfulness can have a cost", "text": "The original reports a tradeoff between measured truthfulness and helpfulness as intervention strength changes. Stronger steering is not automatically a better product. Benchmark results also do not prove the existence of a universal truth detector. The credited contribution is the supervised attention-head intervention and its bounded evidence, rather than every later truthfulness or activation-steering result." }, { "title": "A practical reading task", "text": "Create a small comparison table for the paper's intervention settings: what is optimized, what is measured and what gets worse. Preserve unknown costs or untested models as unknown. Someone choosing a method needs these tradeoffs more than a single impressive percentage. Reading and checking this table is possible before attempting an expensive replication." } ], "references": [ { "title": "Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341v1", "locator": "Pinned original contribution and stated hypotheses or experimental limits." } ] }, "reading_status": "EXPLANATORY_GUIDE" }