{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959",
    "title": "Lax and Wendroff: preserve conservation when approximating waves and shocks",
    "summary": "Lax and Wendroff identify the weak limit of a boundedly convergent conservative difference scheme and construct higher-accuracy difference formulas with artificial-viscosity treatments for shock calculations.\n\nA shock is a sudden jump, so the derivatives in a fluid equation can cease to make ordinary sense. Conservation can still be expressed by integrating over space and time. Lax and Wendroff show how a discrete flux shared by neighbouring cells preserves this structure: under the required consistency and regularity, a boundedly convergent numerical sequence has a weak limit satisfying the conservation law. This identifies the limit; it does not supply convergence or physical entropy admissibility by itself. The report then develops a second-order construction for smooth parts of the solution and additional viscosity terms near shocks. Its stability analysis uses localized linearized tests and stated assumptions; some shock-width and system arguments are approximate or conjectural. Two hydrodynamic calculations illustrate the method. Both the theoretical distinction and the numerical construction became important tools, while later nonoscillatory, entropy and convergence results retain their own authorship.",
    "boundary": "The conservation argument requires consistency and convergence of the stated conservative approximations; it does not prove that every such scheme converges. Entropy/admissibility and multidimensional/system behavior need further conditions. The selected report precedes the later published version, and later high-resolution schemes receive separate credit.",
    "area": "Mathematics",
    "topic": "Conservation laws, shock calculations and numerical consistency",
    "year": 1959,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "THEOREM",
    "package_id": "lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:42170c18-6318-449d-a404-ff144e632198",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:9ff735f82a3f673b805a092a95a2a844bc36884e308a14711d04c80a566a4134"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Peter Lax",
      "Burton Wendroff"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "Source-listed contributors to this scoped work. Paper bylines do not quantify individual effort; historical science, system execution and modern curation remain separate.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [
      "courant-friedrichs-lewy-difference-equations-1928",
      "lax-richtmyer-linear-stability-convergence-1956",
      "roe-parameter-vector-approximate-riemann-solver-1981"
    ],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "wrs24-lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959-original",
        "title": "PeterLax and BurtonWendroff, Systems of Conservation Laws, LA2285 — original1959distributed report",
        "url": "https://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/dtic/ADA385056.pdf"
      },
      {
        "id": "wrs24-lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959-modern-regularity",
        "title": "PhilippBirken and ViktorLinders, Conservation Properties of Iterative Methods for Implicit Discretizations of Conservation Laws(2022) — selected regularity definition only",
        "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-022-01923-7"
      }
    ],
    "points": "170000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959",
      "entry_id": "lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": null,
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:42170c18-6318-449d-a404-ff144e632198",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:9ff735f82a3f673b805a092a95a2a844bc36884e308a14711d04c80a566a4134"
      },
      "what_changed": "Lax and Wendroff identify the weak limit of a boundedly convergent conservative difference scheme and construct higher-accuracy difference formulas with artificial-viscosity treatments for shock calculations.",
      "scope": "Lax and Wendroff identify the weak limit of a boundedly convergent conservative difference scheme and construct higher-accuracy difference formulas with artificial-viscosity treatments for shock calculations. The conservation argument requires consistency and convergence of the stated conservative approximations; it does not prove that every such scheme converges. Entropy/admissibility and multidimensional/system behavior need further conditions. The selected report precedes the later published version, and later high-resolution schemes receive separate credit.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:42170c18-6318-449d-a404-ff144e632198",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:9ff735f82a3f673b805a092a95a2a844bc36884e308a14711d04c80a566a4134"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-03T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Peter Lax",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "PeterLax and BurtonWendroff, Systems of Conservation Laws, LA2285 — original1959distributed report",
            "url": "https://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/dtic/ADA385056.pdf"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Burton Wendroff",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "PeterLax and BurtonWendroff, Systems of Conservation Laws, LA2285 — original1959distributed report",
            "url": "https://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/dtic/ADA385056.pdf"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "PeterLax and BurtonWendroff, Systems of Conservation Laws, LA2285 — original1959distributed report",
            "url": "https://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/dtic/ADA385056.pdf"
          }
        },
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-1",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "PhilippBirken and ViktorLinders, Conservation Properties of Iterative Methods for Implicit Discretizations of Conservation Laws(2022) — selected regularity definition only",
            "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-022-01923-7"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "The conservation argument requires consistency and convergence of the stated conservative approximations; it does not prove that every such scheme converges. Entropy/admissibility and multidimensional/system behavior need further conditions. The selected report precedes the later published version, and later high-resolution schemes receive separate credit.",
        "domain": "Mathematics"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "PeterLax and BurtonWendroff, Systems of Conservation Laws, LA2285 — original1959distributed report",
          "url": "https://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/dtic/ADA385056.pdf"
        },
        {
          "citation": "PhilippBirken and ViktorLinders, Conservation Properties of Iterative Methods for Implicit Discretizations of Conservation Laws(2022) — selected regularity definition only",
          "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-022-01923-7"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Lax and Wendroff: preserve conservation when approximating waves and shocks\n\nLax and Wendroff identify the weak limit of a boundedly convergent conservative difference scheme and construct higher-accuracy difference formulas with artificial-viscosity treatments for shock calculations.\n\nA shock is a sudden jump, so the derivatives in a fluid equation can cease to make ordinary sense. Conservation can still be expressed by integrating over space and time. Lax and Wendroff show how a discrete flux shared by neighbouring cells preserves this structure: under the required consistency and regularity, a boundedly convergent numerical sequence has a weak limit satisfying the conservation law. This identifies the limit; it does not supply convergence or physical entropy admissibility by itself. The report then develops a second-order construction for smooth parts of the solution and additional viscosity terms near shocks. Its stability analysis uses localized linearized tests and stated assumptions; some shock-width and system arguments are approximate or conjectural. Two hydrodynamic calculations illustrate the method. Both the theoretical distinction and the numerical construction became important tools, while later nonoscillatory, entropy and convergence results retain their own authorship.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThe conservation argument requires consistency and convergence of the stated conservative approximations; it does not prove that every such scheme converges. Entropy/admissibility and multidimensional/system behavior need further conditions. The selected report precedes the later published version, and later high-resolution schemes receive separate credit.\n\n## People and systems\n\nPeter Lax; Burton Wendroff\n\n\n\n## Original sources\n\n- [PeterLax and BurtonWendroff, Systems of Conservation Laws, LA2285 — original1959distributed report](https://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/dtic/ADA385056.pdf)\n- [PhilippBirken and ViktorLinders, Conservation Properties of Iterative Methods for Implicit Discretizations of Conservation Laws(2022) — selected regularity definition only](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-022-01923-7)\n",
      "summary": "Lax and Wendroff identify the weak limit of a boundedly convergent conservative difference scheme and construct higher-accuracy difference formulas with artificial-viscosity treatments for shock calculations.\n\nA shock is a sudden jump, so the derivatives in a fluid equation can cease to make ordinary sense. Conservation can still be expressed by integrating over space and time. Lax and Wendroff show how a discrete flux shared by neighbouring cells preserves this structure: under the required consistency and regularity, a boundedly convergent numerical sequence has a weak limit satisfying the conservation law. This identifies the limit; it does not supply convergence or physical entropy admissibility by itself. The report then develops a second-order construction for smooth parts of the solution and additional viscosity terms near shocks. Its stability analysis uses localized linearized tests and stated assumptions; some shock-width and system arguments are approximate or conjectural. Two hydrodynamic calculations illustrate the method. Both the theoretical distinction and the numerical construction became important tools, while later nonoscillatory, entropy and convergence results retain their own authorship.",
      "title": "Lax and Wendroff: preserve conservation when approximating waves and shocks"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:42170c18-6318-449d-a404-ff144e632198",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:42170c18-6318-449d-a404-ff144e632198",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:9ff735f82a3f673b805a092a95a2a844bc36884e308a14711d04c80a566a4134"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:afc312c487d3576b69823354a9dd7729289c9c2198eac53d2194d40baff8967a"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:42170c18-6318-449d-a404-ff144e632198",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:9ff735f82a3f673b805a092a95a2a844bc36884e308a14711d04c80a566a4134"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959",
    "entry_id": "lax-wendroff-conservative-limit-schemes-la2285-1959",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Lax and Wendroff: preserve conservation when approximating waves and shocks",
    "context": "Mathematics",
    "track": "Mathematics",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": null,
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-04",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-04",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Lax and Wendroff identify the weak limit of a boundedly convergent conservative difference scheme and construct higher-accuracy difference formulas with artificial-viscosity treatments for shock calculations.",
    "scope": "Lax and Wendroff identify the weak limit of a boundedly convergent conservative difference scheme and construct higher-accuracy difference formulas with artificial-viscosity treatments for shock calculations. The conservation argument requires consistency and convergence of the stated conservative approximations; it does not prove that every such scheme converges. Entropy/admissibility and multidimensional/system behavior need further conditions. The selected report precedes the later published version, and later high-resolution schemes receive separate credit.",
    "evidence_summary": "Source-linked, scoped account of the original work. The published scope states the scientific assumptions and remaining verification limits. WRS has not independently certified the full proof, experimental result or system benchmark.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Peter Lax and Burton Wendroff, Systems of Conservation Laws, LA 2285 — original 1959 distributed report",
        "url": "https://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/dtic/ADA385056.pdf",
        "locator": "Original linked work. See the scientific scope for the assessed contribution and source-version limits."
      },
      {
        "title": "Philipp Birken and Viktor Linders, Conservation Properties of Iterative Methods for Implicit Discretizations of Conservation Laws(2022) — selected regularity definition only",
        "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-022-01923-7",
        "locator": "Original linked work. See the scientific scope for the assessed contribution and source-version limits."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "Peter Lax",
        "did": "Original source-listed scientific author of this scoped work; byline does not determine effort fractions.",
        "credit": "SCIENCE"
      },
      {
        "who": "Burton Wendroff",
        "did": "Original source-listed scientific author of this scoped work; byline does not determine effort fractions.",
        "credit": "SCIENCE"
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:42170c18-6318-449d-a404-ff144e632198",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:9ff735f82a3f673b805a092a95a2a844bc36884e308a14711d04c80a566a4134"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "170000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": null,
  "reading_status": "SOURCE_LINKED_NOTE"
}