{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "fei-palomaki-wte2-monolayer-edge-conduction-2016",
    "title": "Edge conduction in insulating monolayer WTe₂",
    "summary": "Fei, Palomaki and colleagues measured monolayer WTe₂ devices and found edge-dominated conduction as the interior became insulating below roughly 100 K. Nonlocal measurements and grounded pincer contacts separated edge and bulk conduction, while an in-plane magnetic field suppressed the edge response. Bilayer devices offered a comparison. A later microwave impedance microscopy study mapped enhanced conductivity along physical edges and additional internal lines in separate monolayer samples.",
    "boundary": "The 2016 v1 reports individual measured edge conductances below the ideal e²/h, reaching about half that value in its short-edge comparison. It interprets these and magnetic-field effects as consistent with helical topological edge transport rather than directly measuring spin polarization. The bulk transition mechanism and detailed scattering remain unresolved. The later Wu–Fatemi work uses different devices and a shorter locally gated channel to approach quantization; it is not the same dataset. This record describes the v1 preprint; the 2017 published version may differ. The later imaging is local microwave admittance, not direct spin polarization imaging or a replay of the earlier devices. Its interpretation uses finite-element response models; conducting internal lines and rings are interpreted as cracks or material boundaries, with contact and oxidation effects considered. Edge signal remains visible in one illustrated sample at 100 K, not a universal transition. The cited nine-page 2018 author version is accompanied by separate supplementary material. Its distinct twelve-author team is attributed to this follow-up alone.",
    "area": "Condensed matter and topological transport",
    "topic": "Physics",
    "year": 2016,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "EMPIRICAL",
    "package_id": "fei-palomaki-wte2-monolayer-edge-conduction-2016",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:596aa5b7-b812-4cc1-a2f1-1d2cd05fb5c2",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:5be85ccc6ec9bcdaa5ba8b42e2556ea76846ecd4adb8839d8b2a9c5e11b52292"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Zaiyao Fei",
      "Tauno Palomaki",
      "Sanfeng Wu",
      "Wenjin Zhao",
      "Xinghan Cai",
      "Bosong Sun",
      "Paul Nguyen",
      "Joseph Finney",
      "Xiaodong Xu",
      "David H. Cobden"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "fei-palomaki-wte2-edge-2016-v1",
        "title": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1",
        "date": "2016-10-25"
      },
      {
        "id": "shi-kahn-niu-wte2-edge-microscopy-2018-v1",
        "title": "Imaging Quantum Spin Hall Edges in Monolayer WTe2",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.09342v1",
        "date": "2018-07-24"
      }
    ],
    "points": "115000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "fei-palomaki-wte2-monolayer-edge-conduction-2016",
      "entry_id": "fei-palomaki-wte2-monolayer-edge-conduction-2016",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": null,
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:596aa5b7-b812-4cc1-a2f1-1d2cd05fb5c2",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:5be85ccc6ec9bcdaa5ba8b42e2556ea76846ecd4adb8839d8b2a9c5e11b52292"
      },
      "what_changed": "Fei, Palomaki and colleagues measured monolayer WTe₂ devices and found edge-dominated conduction as the interior became insulating below roughly 100 K. Nonlocal measurements and grounded pincer contacts separated edge and bulk conduction, while an in-plane magnetic field suppressed the edge response. Bilayer devices offered a comparison. A later microwave impedance microscopy study mapped enhanced conductivity along physical edges and additional internal lines in separate monolayer samples.",
      "scope": "Fei, Palomaki and colleagues measured monolayer WTe₂ devices and found edge-dominated conduction as the interior became insulating below roughly 100 K. Nonlocal measurements and grounded pincer contacts separated edge and bulk conduction, while an in-plane magnetic field suppressed the edge response. Bilayer devices offered a comparison. A later microwave impedance microscopy study mapped enhanced conductivity along physical edges and additional internal lines in separate monolayer samples. The 2016 v1 reports individual measured edge conductances below the ideal e²/h, reaching about half that value in its short-edge comparison. It interprets these and magnetic-field effects as consistent with helical topological edge transport rather than directly measuring spin polarization. The bulk transition mechanism and detailed scattering remain unresolved. The later Wu–Fatemi work uses different devices and a shorter locally gated channel to approach quantization; it is not the same dataset. This record describes the v1 preprint; the 2017 published version may differ. The later imaging is local microwave admittance, not direct spin polarization imaging or a replay of the earlier devices. Its interpretation uses finite-element response models; conducting internal lines and rings are interpreted as cracks or material boundaries, with contact and oxidation effects considered. Edge signal remains visible in one illustrated sample at 100 K, not a universal transition. The cited nine-page 2018 author version is accompanied by separate supplementary material. Its distinct twelve-author team is attributed to this follow-up alone.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:596aa5b7-b812-4cc1-a2f1-1d2cd05fb5c2",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:5be85ccc6ec9bcdaa5ba8b42e2556ea76846ecd4adb8839d8b2a9c5e11b52292"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-28T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Zaiyao Fei",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Tauno Palomaki",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Sanfeng Wu",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Wenjin Zhao",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Xinghan Cai",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Bosong Sun",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Paul Nguyen",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Joseph Finney",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Xiaodong Xu",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "David H. Cobden",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-1",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Imaging Quantum Spin Hall Edges in Monolayer WTe2",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.09342v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "The 2016 v1 reports individual measured edge conductances below the ideal e²/h, reaching about half that value in its short-edge comparison. It interprets these and magnetic-field effects as consistent with helical topological edge transport rather than directly measuring spin polarization. The bulk transition mechanism and detailed scattering remain unresolved. The later Wu–Fatemi work uses different devices and a shorter locally gated channel to approach quantization; it is not the same dataset. This record describes the v1 preprint; the 2017 published version may differ. The later imaging is local microwave admittance, not direct spin polarization imaging or a replay of the earlier devices. Its interpretation uses finite-element response models; conducting internal lines and rings are interpreted as cracks or material boundaries, with contact and oxidation effects considered. Edge signal remains visible in one illustrated sample at 100 K, not a universal transition. The cited nine-page 2018 author version is accompanied by separate supplementary material. Its distinct twelve-author team is attributed to this follow-up alone.",
        "domain": "Condensed matter and topological transport"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1"
        },
        {
          "citation": "Imaging Quantum Spin Hall Edges in Monolayer WTe2",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.09342v1"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Edge conduction in insulating monolayer WTe₂\n\nFei, Palomaki and colleagues measured monolayer WTe₂ devices and found edge-dominated conduction as the interior became insulating below roughly 100 K. Nonlocal measurements and grounded pincer contacts separated edge and bulk conduction, while an in-plane magnetic field suppressed the edge response. Bilayer devices offered a comparison. A later microwave impedance microscopy study mapped enhanced conductivity along physical edges and additional internal lines in separate monolayer samples.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThe 2016 v1 reports individual measured edge conductances below the ideal e²/h, reaching about half that value in its short-edge comparison. It interprets these and magnetic-field effects as consistent with helical topological edge transport rather than directly measuring spin polarization. The bulk transition mechanism and detailed scattering remain unresolved. The later Wu–Fatemi work uses different devices and a shorter locally gated channel to approach quantization; it is not the same dataset. This record describes the v1 preprint; the 2017 published version may differ. The later imaging is local microwave admittance, not direct spin polarization imaging or a replay of the earlier devices. Its interpretation uses finite-element response models; conducting internal lines and rings are interpreted as cracks or material boundaries, with contact and oxidation effects considered. Edge signal remains visible in one illustrated sample at 100 K, not a universal transition. The cited nine-page 2018 author version is accompanied by separate supplementary material. Its distinct twelve-author team is attributed to this follow-up alone.\n\n## Reading status\n\nThis is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.\n\n## People and systems\n\nZaiyao Fei; Tauno Palomaki; Sanfeng Wu; Wenjin Zhao; Xinghan Cai; Bosong Sun; Paul Nguyen; Joseph Finney; Xiaodong Xu; David H. Cobden\n\nThese are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged.\n\n\n\n## Original sources\n\n- [Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1)\n- [Imaging Quantum Spin Hall Edges in Monolayer WTe2](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.09342v1)\n",
      "summary": "Fei, Palomaki and colleagues measured monolayer WTe₂ devices and found edge-dominated conduction as the interior became insulating below roughly 100 K. Nonlocal measurements and grounded pincer contacts separated edge and bulk conduction, while an in-plane magnetic field suppressed the edge response. Bilayer devices offered a comparison. A later microwave impedance microscopy study mapped enhanced conductivity along physical edges and additional internal lines in separate monolayer samples.",
      "title": "Edge conduction in insulating monolayer WTe₂"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:596aa5b7-b812-4cc1-a2f1-1d2cd05fb5c2",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:596aa5b7-b812-4cc1-a2f1-1d2cd05fb5c2",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:5be85ccc6ec9bcdaa5ba8b42e2556ea76846ecd4adb8839d8b2a9c5e11b52292"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:1ecaba972b422e8522816e5248b70bcafce5628929ea1d7db389209e2074e088"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:596aa5b7-b812-4cc1-a2f1-1d2cd05fb5c2",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:5be85ccc6ec9bcdaa5ba8b42e2556ea76846ecd4adb8839d8b2a9c5e11b52292"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "fei-palomaki-wte2-monolayer-edge-conduction-2016",
    "entry_id": "fei-palomaki-wte2-monolayer-edge-conduction-2016",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Edge conduction in insulating monolayer WTe₂",
    "context": "Condensed matter and topological transport",
    "track": "Source-reported experimental result or reusable measurement method",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": null,
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-28",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-28",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Fei, Palomaki and colleagues measured monolayer WTe₂ devices and found edge-dominated conduction as the interior became insulating below roughly 100 K. Nonlocal measurements and grounded pincer contacts separated edge and bulk conduction, while an in-plane magnetic field suppressed the edge response. Bilayer devices offered a comparison. A later microwave impedance microscopy study mapped enhanced conductivity along physical edges and additional internal lines in separate monolayer samples.",
    "scope": "Fei, Palomaki and colleagues measured monolayer WTe₂ devices and found edge-dominated conduction as the interior became insulating below roughly 100 K. Nonlocal measurements and grounded pincer contacts separated edge and bulk conduction, while an in-plane magnetic field suppressed the edge response. Bilayer devices offered a comparison. A later microwave impedance microscopy study mapped enhanced conductivity along physical edges and additional internal lines in separate monolayer samples. The 2016 v1 reports individual measured edge conductances below the ideal e²/h, reaching about half that value in its short-edge comparison. It interprets these and magnetic-field effects as consistent with helical topological edge transport rather than directly measuring spin polarization. The bulk transition mechanism and detailed scattering remain unresolved. The later Wu–Fatemi work uses different devices and a shorter locally gated channel to approach quantization; it is not the same dataset. This record describes the v1 preprint; the 2017 published version may differ. The later imaging is local microwave admittance, not direct spin polarization imaging or a replay of the earlier devices. Its interpretation uses finite-element response models; conducting internal lines and rings are interpreted as cracks or material boundaries, with contact and oxidation effects considered. Edge signal remains visible in one illustrated sample at 100 K, not a universal transition. The cited nine-page 2018 author version is accompanied by separate supplementary material. Its distinct twelve-author team is attributed to this follow-up alone.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. The 2016 v1 reports individual measured edge conductances below the ideal e²/h, reaching about half that value in its short-edge comparison. It interprets these and magnetic-field effects as consistent with helical topological edge transport rather than directly measuring spin polarization. The bulk transition mechanism and detailed scattering remain unresolved. The later Wu–Fatemi work uses different devices and a shorter locally gated channel to approach quantization; it is not the same dataset. This record describes the v1 preprint; the 2017 published version may differ. The later imaging is local microwave admittance, not direct spin polarization imaging or a replay of the earlier devices. Its interpretation uses finite-element response models; conducting internal lines and rings are interpreted as cracks or material boundaries, with contact and oxidation effects considered. Edge signal remains visible in one illustrated sample at 100 K, not a universal transition. The cited nine-page 2018 author version is accompanied by separate supplementary material. Its distinct twelve-author team is attributed to this follow-up alone.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Topological insulator behavior in monolayer WTe₂",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07924v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      },
      {
        "title": "Imaging Quantum Spin Hall Edges in Monolayer WTe2",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.09342v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "The named authors in the research record",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "These are the listed authors of the cited contribution sources. Paper authorship does not quantify individual effort. An incomplete list is explicitly marked; same names are not automatically merged."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:596aa5b7-b812-4cc1-a2f1-1d2cd05fb5c2",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:5be85ccc6ec9bcdaa5ba8b42e2556ea76846ecd4adb8839d8b2a9c5e11b52292"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "115000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": null,
  "reading_status": "SOURCE_LINKED_NOTE"
}