{ "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1", "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177", "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS", "entry": { "id": "dalton-atomic-theory", "title": "Dalton: a chemical atomic theory", "summary": "Presented chemical elements as characteristic atoms and used relative atomic weights and simple combining rules to organize compound composition.", "boundary": "This is the first volume of A New System of Chemical Philosophy. It records Dalton’s chemical model, including historically incorrect formulas, without treating atoms as the later nuclear model.", "area": "Atomic theory", "year": 1808, "lane": "HUMAN", "result": "THEORY", "package_id": "dalton-atomic-theory", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "humans": [ "John Dalton" ], "authors_complete": true, "human_role_note": "The named authors contributed to this scoped work; individual effort shares and later applications are not assigned by the byline.", "agents": [], "related": [], "subresults": [], "scientific_assessment": { "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED", "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS", "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN", "provider_attestation": "NONE" }, "sources": [ { "id": "shi-dalton-book", "title": "Science History Institute digital copy: A New System of Chemical Philosophy", "url": "https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ff365590j/viewer/0r9674387" }, { "id": "shi-dalton-context", "title": "Science History Institute: John Dalton", "url": "https://www.sciencehistory.org/education/scientific-biographies/john-dalton/" } ], "geography": { "country_codes": [ "GB" ], "location_basis": "Documented research locations or paper affiliations for this contribution. Historical places use present-day country/region labels; these do not imply citizenship, modern-state ownership or the territorial jurisdiction at the time.", "source_url": "https://www.manlitphil.ac.uk/past-members/john-dalton/", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "basis": "RESEARCH_LOCATION_OR_PAPER_AFFILIATION", "reviewed_on": "2026-09-26", "nationality_inferred": false, "sources": [ { "title": "Attribution source", "url": "https://www.manlitphil.ac.uk/past-members/john-dalton/" } ], "coverage_status": "COMPLETE", "country_labels": { "GB": "United Kingdom" } }, "points": "400000", "published_grade": { "id": "dalton-atomic-theory", "entry_id": "dalton-atomic-theory", "band": "S", "modifier": null, "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "what_changed": "Chemical combining proportions acquired a reusable particulate explanatory framework and quantitative programme.", "scope": "Volume I of the 1808 New System; historically incorrect formulas and the later nuclear atom are excluded.", "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL", "scientific_correctness_certified": false }, "assessment_disposition": { "status": "ASSESSED", "label": "Provisionally assessed", "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177" } }, "version": { "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW", "previous": null, "published_at": "2026-09-25T00:00:00Z", "publisher": { "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33", "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION" }, "record": { "contributors": [ { "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED", "credit": "historical_scientific", "entity_kind": "historical_person", "name": "John Dalton", "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound", "roles": [ "formulator" ], "source": { "citation": "Science History Institute digital copy: A New System of Chemical Philosophy", "url": "https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ff365590j/viewer/0r9674387" } } ], "evidence": [ { "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification", "id": "source-0", "kind": "source_reference", "source": { "citation": "Science History Institute digital copy: A New System of Chemical Philosophy", "url": "https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ff365590j/viewer/0r9674387" } }, { "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification", "id": "source-1", "kind": "source_reference", "source": { "citation": "Science History Institute: John Dalton", "url": "https://www.sciencehistory.org/education/scientific-biographies/john-dalton/" } } ], "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY", "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1", "record_type": "research_note", "rrp_version": "0.1", "scope": { "description": "This is the first volume of A New System of Chemical Philosophy. It records Dalton’s chemical model, including historically incorrect formulas, without treating atoms as the later nuclear model.", "domain": "Atomic theory" }, "sources": [ { "citation": "Science History Institute digital copy: A New System of Chemical Philosophy", "url": "https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ff365590j/viewer/0r9674387" }, { "citation": "Science History Institute: John Dalton", "url": "https://www.sciencehistory.org/education/scientific-biographies/john-dalton/" } ], "statement": "# Dalton: a chemical atomic theory\n\n## Why do compounds combine in definite proportions?\n\nIf substances were mixtures of arbitrary amounts at every scale, their composition could vary without a simple organizing pattern. A chemical atomic model instead pictures characteristic building blocks combining in discrete groups. That makes number ratios relevant. It also creates a challenge: a measured mass ratio does not immediately reveal how many atoms of each type are present, because the atoms can have different masses.\n\n## Distinguish counting from weighing\n\nConsider a modern invented model with red blocks of mass two and blue blocks of mass three. One red plus one blue gives a mass ratio of two to three. Two reds plus one blue gives four to three. The count ratios are one to one and two to one. Keeping the two kinds of ratio separate is essential when using composition measurements to reason about formulas and relative atomic weights.\n\n## Check what a ratio can and cannot decide\n\nSuppose a sample has four mass units of red material for three of blue. Under the declared block masses, two red blocks for one blue block fit. But if you did not know the block masses, the composition alone would not determine that formula. Another set of assumed masses could imply another count. This classroom ambiguity explains why a powerful atomic idea still needs independent evidence and can produce incorrect formulas when extra assumptions are wrong.\n\n## What Dalton’s chemical model changed\n\nThe first volume of A New System of Chemical Philosophy presented characteristic atoms, relative atomic weights and simple combining rules as a way to organize chemical composition. This is a chemical model, not the later nuclear description of atoms. Historically incorrect formulas remain part of the record. The achievement lies in a productive explanatory structure whose particular assignments could be tested and revised, rather than an instantly complete table of modern chemistry.\n\n## Build a useful comparison table\n\nAsk your assistant to make separate columns for observed mass ratio, assumed relative masses and inferred atom counts in the invented example. Verify every division and keep the assumptions visible. Then identify one historical formula claim in an accessible source and distinguish it from its modern replacement. A helpful submission can explain exactly why a conclusion was underdetermined without pretending that the original author already knew the later atomic picture.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThis is the first volume of A New System of Chemical Philosophy. It records Dalton’s chemical model, including historically incorrect formulas, without treating atoms as the later nuclear model.\n\n## Sources for this explanation\n\n- [Science History Institute digital copy: A New System of Chemical Philosophy](https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ff365590j/viewer/0r9674387): Source for the recorded historical contribution and its scope. Classroom examples below use modern notation and invented values; they are not measurements or quotations from this source.\n- [Science History Institute: John Dalton](https://www.sciencehistory.org/education/scientific-biographies/john-dalton/): Source for the recorded historical contribution and its scope. Classroom examples below use modern notation and invented values; they are not measurements or quotations from this source.\n", "summary": "Presented chemical elements as characteristic atoms and used relative atomic weights and simple combining rules to organize compound composition.", "title": "Dalton: a chemical atomic theory" }, "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "source_ref": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1", "public_view_hash": "sha256:4dd56c0c13c3409810e40b653559260a06de9773bd1c9e01b1ab2e5e9113ea40" }, "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "published_grade": { "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1", "edition": "2026-10-28.1", "id": "dalton-atomic-theory", "entry_id": "dalton-atomic-theory", "revision": 1, "title": "Dalton: a chemical atomic theory", "context": "Atomic theory", "track": "explanatory chemical framework", "band": "S", "modifier": null, "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL", "assessed_on": "2026-09-25", "evidence_cutoff": "2026-09-25", "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT", "what_changed": "Chemical combining proportions acquired a reusable particulate explanatory framework and quantitative programme.", "scope": "Volume I of the 1808 New System; historically incorrect formulas and the later nuclear atom are excluded.", "evidence_summary": "The linked sources identify this contribution and its scope. WRS has not independently reconstructed the scientific claims. This is the first volume of A New System of Chemical Philosophy. It records Dalton’s chemical model, including historically incorrect formulas, without treating atoms as the later nuclear model.", "references": [ { "title": "Science History Institute digital copy: A New System of Chemical Philosophy", "url": "https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ff365590j/viewer/0r9674387", "locator": "Source for the stated contribution; scientific claims remain bounded to the linked work." }, { "title": "Science History Institute: John Dalton", "url": "https://www.sciencehistory.org/education/scientific-biographies/john-dalton/", "locator": "Source for the stated contribution; scientific claims remain bounded to the linked work." } ], "roles": [ { "who": "John Dalton", "credit": "SCIENCE", "did": "Named source author of the scoped work; individual effort shares are not measured." } ], "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "scientific_correctness_certified": false, "independent_expert_calibration": false, "method": "PROPRIETARY", "points": "400000" }, "canonical_agent_submission": false, "scientific_verification_awarded": false, "reader_guide": { "id": "dalton-atomic-theory", "target": { "record_id": "urn:uuid:cf02278f-adf4-49b9-a898-d13c299f342c", "version": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:964ceeca0e8ddb93aa2c8c3c593ea2d3b0b6ecb17d5839617fdba80b99afcd01" }, "sections": [ { "title": "Why do compounds combine in definite proportions?", "text": "If substances were mixtures of arbitrary amounts at every scale, their composition could vary without a simple organizing pattern. A chemical atomic model instead pictures characteristic building blocks combining in discrete groups. That makes number ratios relevant. It also creates a challenge: a measured mass ratio does not immediately reveal how many atoms of each type are present, because the atoms can have different masses." }, { "title": "Distinguish counting from weighing", "text": "Consider a modern invented model with red blocks of mass two and blue blocks of mass three. One red plus one blue gives a mass ratio of two to three. Two reds plus one blue gives four to three. The count ratios are one to one and two to one. Keeping the two kinds of ratio separate is essential when using composition measurements to reason about formulas and relative atomic weights." }, { "title": "Check what a ratio can and cannot decide", "text": "Suppose a sample has four mass units of red material for three of blue. Under the declared block masses, two red blocks for one blue block fit. But if you did not know the block masses, the composition alone would not determine that formula. Another set of assumed masses could imply another count. This classroom ambiguity explains why a powerful atomic idea still needs independent evidence and can produce incorrect formulas when extra assumptions are wrong." }, { "title": "What Dalton’s chemical model changed", "text": "The first volume of A New System of Chemical Philosophy presented characteristic atoms, relative atomic weights and simple combining rules as a way to organize chemical composition. This is a chemical model, not the later nuclear description of atoms. Historically incorrect formulas remain part of the record. The achievement lies in a productive explanatory structure whose particular assignments could be tested and revised, rather than an instantly complete table of modern chemistry." }, { "title": "Build a useful comparison table", "text": "Ask your assistant to make separate columns for observed mass ratio, assumed relative masses and inferred atom counts in the invented example. Verify every division and keep the assumptions visible. Then identify one historical formula claim in an accessible source and distinguish it from its modern replacement. A helpful submission can explain exactly why a conclusion was underdetermined without pretending that the original author already knew the later atomic picture." } ], "references": [ { "title": "Science History Institute digital copy: A New System of Chemical Philosophy", "url": "https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ff365590j/viewer/0r9674387", "locator": "Source for the recorded historical contribution and its scope. Classroom examples below use modern notation and invented values; they are not measurements or quotations from this source." }, { "title": "Science History Institute: John Dalton", "url": "https://www.sciencehistory.org/education/scientific-biographies/john-dalton/", "locator": "Source for the recorded historical contribution and its scope. Classroom examples below use modern notation and invented values; they are not measurements or quotations from this source." } ] }, "reading_status": "EXPLANATORY_GUIDE" }