{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "behrouz-et-al-miras-memory-objective-retention-2025",
    "title": "MIRAS: choosing how a neural memory learns and retains information",
    "summary": "Two memory systems can read the same text yet preserve different details. MIRAS makes four design choices explicit: the memory architecture, the objective used to learn associations, the rule for retaining old information and the learning algorithm. The researchers use this perspective to construct Moneta, Yaad and Memora, including variants based on robust losses and different regularizers. Their experiments compare language modeling, recall and other tasks. The contribution is this organizing framework and its demonstrated new variants, rather than invention of associative memory or the optimization tools it combines.",
    "boundary": "The paper reports bounded experiments, with different variants winning different metrics. Its chunkwise parallel updates are not identical to arbitrary tokenwise nonlinear learning. Robust losses do not guarantee immunity to every outlier, and numerical results do not certify every mathematical interpretation in the paper. Existing Titans, fast-weight, Huber-loss and mirror-descent contributions remain separate. The neural model named Memora here is distinct from Xia and colleagues’ later external MEMORA system.",
    "area": "Recurrent sequence-model design",
    "topic": "Artificial intelligence",
    "year": 2025,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "ALGORITHM",
    "package_id": "behrouz-et-al-miras-memory-objective-retention-2025",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:5a595353-ae0f-48d0-aa48-be59f54c8e7b",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:c9e474f2fc8a20e86ea861352d276931b5169cd9e0e3b9bf11e6902cd0131f91"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Ali Behrouz",
      "Meisam Razaviyayn",
      "Peilin Zhong",
      "Vahab Mirrokni"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "Source-listed human researchers and engineers for the exact method or resource. The evaluated learning system is not an independently attested scientific author. Earlier methods, funding and data-collection roles remain separate. Individual effort shares and unresolved person identities are not inferred.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "cur20261017-arxiv-2504-13173v1",
        "title": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1",
        "date": "2025-04-17"
      }
    ],
    "points": "120000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "behrouz-et-al-miras-memory-objective-retention-2025",
      "entry_id": "behrouz-et-al-miras-memory-objective-retention-2025",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": null,
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:5a595353-ae0f-48d0-aa48-be59f54c8e7b",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:c9e474f2fc8a20e86ea861352d276931b5169cd9e0e3b9bf11e6902cd0131f91"
      },
      "what_changed": "Two memory systems can read the same text yet preserve different details. MIRAS makes four design choices explicit: the memory architecture, the objective used to learn associations, the rule for retaining old information and the learning algorithm. The researchers use this perspective to construct Moneta, Yaad and Memora, including variants based on robust losses and different regularizers. Their experiments compare language modeling, recall and other tasks. The contribution is this organizing framework and its demonstrated new variants, rather than invention of associative memory or the optimization tools it combines.",
      "scope": "Two memory systems can read the same text yet preserve different details. MIRAS makes four design choices explicit: the memory architecture, the objective used to learn associations, the rule for retaining old information and the learning algorithm. The researchers use this perspective to construct Moneta, Yaad and Memora, including variants based on robust losses and different regularizers. Their experiments compare language modeling, recall and other tasks. The contribution is this organizing framework and its demonstrated new variants, rather than invention of associative memory or the optimization tools it combines. The paper reports bounded experiments, with different variants winning different metrics. Its chunkwise parallel updates are not identical to arbitrary tokenwise nonlinear learning. Robust losses do not guarantee immunity to every outlier, and numerical results do not certify every mathematical interpretation in the paper. Existing Titans, fast-weight, Huber-loss and mirror-descent contributions remain separate. The neural model named Memora here is distinct from Xia and colleagues’ later external MEMORA system.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:5a595353-ae0f-48d0-aa48-be59f54c8e7b",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:c9e474f2fc8a20e86ea861352d276931b5169cd9e0e3b9bf11e6902cd0131f91"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-23T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Ali Behrouz",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Meisam Razaviyayn",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Peilin Zhong",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Vahab Mirrokni",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "The paper reports bounded experiments, with different variants winning different metrics. Its chunkwise parallel updates are not identical to arbitrary tokenwise nonlinear learning. Robust losses do not guarantee immunity to every outlier, and numerical results do not certify every mathematical interpretation in the paper. Existing Titans, fast-weight, Huber-loss and mirror-descent contributions remain separate. The neural model named Memora here is distinct from Xia and colleagues’ later external MEMORA system.",
        "domain": "Recurrent sequence-model design"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# MIRAS: choosing how a neural memory learns and retains information\n\nTwo memory systems can read the same text yet preserve different details. MIRAS makes four design choices explicit: the memory architecture, the objective used to learn associations, the rule for retaining old information and the learning algorithm. The researchers use this perspective to construct Moneta, Yaad and Memora, including variants based on robust losses and different regularizers. Their experiments compare language modeling, recall and other tasks. The contribution is this organizing framework and its demonstrated new variants, rather than invention of associative memory or the optimization tools it combines.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThe paper reports bounded experiments, with different variants winning different metrics. Its chunkwise parallel updates are not identical to arbitrary tokenwise nonlinear learning. Robust losses do not guarantee immunity to every outlier, and numerical results do not certify every mathematical interpretation in the paper. Existing Titans, fast-weight, Huber-loss and mirror-descent contributions remain separate. The neural model named Memora here is distinct from Xia and colleagues’ later external MEMORA system.\n\n## Reading status\n\nThis is a source-linked WRS catalogue note. A full explanatory guide and independent scientific reconstruction have not been completed for this entry. Read the identified original work for its complete narrative and arguments.\n\n## People and systems\n\nAli Behrouz; Meisam Razaviyayn; Peilin Zhong; Vahab Mirrokni\n\nSource-listed human researchers and engineers for the exact method or resource. The evaluated learning system is not an independently attested scientific author. Earlier methods, funding and data-collection roles remain separate. Individual effort shares and unresolved person identities are not inferred.\n\n\n\n## Original sources\n\n- [It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1)\n",
      "summary": "Two memory systems can read the same text yet preserve different details. MIRAS makes four design choices explicit: the memory architecture, the objective used to learn associations, the rule for retaining old information and the learning algorithm. The researchers use this perspective to construct Moneta, Yaad and Memora, including variants based on robust losses and different regularizers. Their experiments compare language modeling, recall and other tasks. The contribution is this organizing framework and its demonstrated new variants, rather than invention of associative memory or the optimization tools it combines.",
      "title": "MIRAS: choosing how a neural memory learns and retains information"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:5a595353-ae0f-48d0-aa48-be59f54c8e7b",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:5a595353-ae0f-48d0-aa48-be59f54c8e7b",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:c9e474f2fc8a20e86ea861352d276931b5169cd9e0e3b9bf11e6902cd0131f91"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:1d537ae9372013d20075c060b14dd5be56bd55a2069ffc384bfd7ffe4d9dbf55"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:5a595353-ae0f-48d0-aa48-be59f54c8e7b",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:c9e474f2fc8a20e86ea861352d276931b5169cd9e0e3b9bf11e6902cd0131f91"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "behrouz-et-al-miras-memory-objective-retention-2025",
    "entry_id": "behrouz-et-al-miras-memory-objective-retention-2025",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "MIRAS: choosing how a neural memory learns and retains information",
    "context": "Recurrent sequence-model design",
    "track": "Reusable scientific method, experimental result or historical framework",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": null,
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-23",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-23",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Two memory systems can read the same text yet preserve different details. MIRAS makes four design choices explicit: the memory architecture, the objective used to learn associations, the rule for retaining old information and the learning algorithm. The researchers use this perspective to construct Moneta, Yaad and Memora, including variants based on robust losses and different regularizers. Their experiments compare language modeling, recall and other tasks. The contribution is this organizing framework and its demonstrated new variants, rather than invention of associative memory or the optimization tools it combines.",
    "scope": "Two memory systems can read the same text yet preserve different details. MIRAS makes four design choices explicit: the memory architecture, the objective used to learn associations, the rule for retaining old information and the learning algorithm. The researchers use this perspective to construct Moneta, Yaad and Memora, including variants based on robust losses and different regularizers. Their experiments compare language modeling, recall and other tasks. The contribution is this organizing framework and its demonstrated new variants, rather than invention of associative memory or the optimization tools it combines. The paper reports bounded experiments, with different variants winning different metrics. Its chunkwise parallel updates are not identical to arbitrary tokenwise nonlinear learning. Robust losses do not guarantee immunity to every outlier, and numerical results do not certify every mathematical interpretation in the paper. Existing Titans, fast-weight, Huber-loss and mirror-descent contributions remain separate. The neural model named Memora here is distinct from Xia and colleagues’ later external MEMORA system.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. The paper reports bounded experiments, with different variants winning different metrics. Its chunkwise parallel updates are not identical to arbitrary tokenwise nonlinear learning. Robust losses do not guarantee immunity to every outlier, and numerical results do not certify every mathematical interpretation in the paper. Existing Titans, fast-weight, Huber-loss and mirror-descent contributions remain separate. The neural model named Memora here is distinct from Xia and colleagues’ later external MEMORA system.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13173v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "The named authors in the research record",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "Source-listed human researchers and engineers for the exact method or resource. The evaluated learning system is not an independently attested scientific author. Earlier methods, funding and data-collection roles remain separate. Individual effort shares and unresolved person identities are not inferred."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:5a595353-ae0f-48d0-aa48-be59f54c8e7b",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:c9e474f2fc8a20e86ea861352d276931b5169cd9e0e3b9bf11e6902cd0131f91"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "120000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": null,
  "reading_status": "SOURCE_LINKED_NOTE"
}