{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "anderegg-single-caf-optical-tweezer-array-2019",
    "title": "Single laser-cooled molecules are trapped and imaged in an optical tweezer array",
    "summary": "Anderegg and colleagues loaded individual calcium monofluoride molecules into five optical tweezers and used fluorescence to identify occupied sites. In the reported setup, the average loading probability was about 34% per trap; the authors obtained 92% detection fidelity under optimized imaging conditions. The team also studied loss associated with collisions.",
    "boundary": "Loading was stochastic, and detection fidelity is not the same as loading probability. The experiment did not demonstrate a defect-free rearranged array or a molecular quantum gate. Collision rates depend on estimates and the measured loss channels were not uniquely identified.",
    "area": "Atomic and molecular physics / single-particle trapping",
    "topic": "Physics",
    "year": 2019,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "EMPIRICAL",
    "package_id": "anderegg-single-caf-optical-tweezer-array-2019",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Loïc Anderegg",
      "Lawrence W. Cheuk",
      "Yicheng Bao",
      "Sean Burchesky",
      "Wolfgang Ketterle",
      "Kang-Kuen Ni",
      "John M. Doyle"
    ],
    "human_identities": [
      {
        "author_position": 0,
        "source_name": "Loïc Anderegg",
        "person_id": "wrs-person-1c4ad0870bf64577bad64223",
        "display_name": "Loïc Anderegg",
        "status": "SOURCE_LINKED_IDENTITY",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ORCID public identity and works",
            "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4282-3369"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sisyphus laser cooling of a polyatomic molecule (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.02254v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sisyphus Laser Cooling of a Polyatomic Molecule (Physical Review Letters, 2017)",
            "url": "https://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.173201"
          },
          {
            "title": "Magneto-optical trapping and sub-Doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.08349v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.04571v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold polyatomic molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.07529v1"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "author_position": 1,
        "source_name": "Lawrence W. Cheuk",
        "person_id": "wrs-person-152addcbf9b973d213c3ef38",
        "display_name": "Lawrence W. Cheuk",
        "status": "SOURCE_LINKED_IDENTITY",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ORCID public identity and works",
            "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8329-8812"
          },
          {
            "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.04571v1"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "author_position": 6,
        "source_name": "John M. Doyle",
        "person_id": "wrs-person-e61b21e277583657dbc3b5ab",
        "display_name": "John M. Doyle",
        "status": "SOURCE_LINKED_IDENTITY",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Research group author profile",
            "url": "https://ultracoldmolecules.com/author/john-m.-doyle/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sisyphus laser cooling of a polyatomic molecule (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.02254v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sisyphus Laser Cooling of a Polyatomic Molecule (Physical Review Letters, 2017)",
            "url": "https://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.173201"
          },
          {
            "title": "Magneto-optical trapping and sub-Doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.08349v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.04571v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold polyatomic molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.07529v1"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "author_position": 2,
        "source_name": "Yicheng Bao",
        "person_id": "wrs-person-c28f3119009623644ba5e3b5",
        "display_name": "Yicheng Bao",
        "status": "SOURCE_LINKED_IDENTITY",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Research group author profile",
            "url": "https://ultracoldmolecules.com/author/yicheng-bao/"
          },
          {
            "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.04571v1"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "author_position": 3,
        "source_name": "Sean Burchesky",
        "person_id": "wrs-person-64f5cdb2dc1d0532a45b121e",
        "display_name": "Sean Burchesky",
        "status": "SOURCE_LINKED_IDENTITY",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Research group author profile",
            "url": "https://ultracoldmolecules.com/author/sean-burchesky/"
          },
          {
            "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.04571v1"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "These are the source-listed authors of this specific paper. Individual effort, author nationality and unresolved cross-record identities are not inferred.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "anderegg-caf-tweezer-array-190200497v1",
        "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1",
        "date": "2019-02-01"
      }
    ],
    "geography": {
      "country_codes": [
        "US"
      ],
      "location_basis": "The original paper lists Harvard University, the Harvard–MIT Center for Ultracold Atoms and MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. Affiliations identify research locations, not individual nationalities or scientific ownership.",
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
      },
      "basis": "RESEARCH_LOCATION_OR_PAPER_AFFILIATION",
      "reviewed_on": "2026-10-27",
      "nationality_inferred": false,
      "sources": [
        {
          "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
        }
      ],
      "coverage_status": "COMPLETE",
      "country_labels": {
        "US": "United States"
      }
    },
    "points": "105000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "anderegg-single-caf-optical-tweezer-array-2019",
      "entry_id": "anderegg-single-caf-optical-tweezer-array-2019",
      "band": "A",
      "modifier": null,
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
      },
      "what_changed": "Anderegg and colleagues loaded individual calcium monofluoride molecules into five optical tweezers and used fluorescence to identify occupied sites. In the reported setup, the average loading probability was about 34% per trap; the authors obtained 92% detection fidelity under optimized imaging conditions. The team also studied loss associated with collisions.",
      "scope": "Anderegg and colleagues loaded individual calcium monofluoride molecules into five optical tweezers and used fluorescence to identify occupied sites. In the reported setup, the average loading probability was about 34% per trap; the authors obtained 92% detection fidelity under optimized imaging conditions. The team also studied loss associated with collisions. Loading was stochastic, and detection fidelity is not the same as loading probability. The experiment did not demonstrate a defect-free rearranged array or a molecular quantum gate. Collision rates depend on estimates and the measured loss channels were not uniquely identified.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-27T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Loïc Anderegg",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Lawrence W. Cheuk",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Yicheng Bao",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Sean Burchesky",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Wolfgang Ketterle",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Kang-Kuen Ni",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "John M. Doyle",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "discoverer"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "Loading was stochastic, and detection fidelity is not the same as loading probability. The experiment did not demonstrate a defect-free rearranged array or a molecular quantum gate. Collision rates depend on estimates and the measured loss channels were not uniquely identified.",
        "domain": "Atomic and molecular physics / single-particle trapping"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Single laser-cooled molecules are trapped and imaged in an optical tweezer array\n\n## A row of tiny light traps\n\nAn optical tweezer is a tightly focused beam of light that can hold a small particle near its focus. Here the team used five such traps to study individual cold molecules, rather than treating a large cloud as one object. The traps are a laboratory tool, not physical tweezers that squeeze the molecule. Their focused light creates a potential that can hold a particle near a chosen location under the reported conditions.\n\n## How did they identify a molecule?\n\nThe researchers illuminated the traps and collected fluorescence. Photon counts helped distinguish an empty site from an occupied one. The experiment also used collisions under light to remove multiple occupancy, making single-site analysis possible. The measurement is probabilistic: there can be background counts or too little collected light. A detection method is assessed by how well its thresholds separate the observed distributions.\n\n## Two percentages answer different questions\n\nThe average loading probability was about 34% per trap. Under optimized imaging conditions, the reported detection fidelity was 92%. The first describes how often a site was loaded; the second describes how well a measurement distinguishes occupancy under that procedure. One does not imply the other. As a teaching calculation, if each of five sites had a 34% loading probability, the expected number of occupied sites would be five times 0.34, or 1.7. This average does not mean that a single image contains 1.7 molecules, and it is not a measured quantum-gate success rate.\n\n## What came next?\n\nThe five sites were not deterministically filled, and this paper did not demonstrate a quantum gate between molecules. The authors studied collision-related loss, whose underlying channels were not uniquely settled by the reported measurements. Not every lost molecule reveals which collision process caused its loss. A result can support a useful platform while leaving the detailed loss mechanism unresolved.\n\n## Try a small source check\n\nAsk your agent to find the figure with the five traps and the text reporting the two percentages. Have it label one as loading and the other as detection, then verify those labels against the linked paper. Do not report either percentage as a probability of a successful quantum computation. If your agent multiplies the loading and detection percentages, ask it to state the event and assumptions first. The original article reports those values for different purposes and they should not automatically be presented as a combined outcome.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nLoading was stochastic, and detection fidelity is not the same as loading probability. The experiment did not demonstrate a defect-free rearranged array or a molecular quantum gate. Collision rates depend on estimates and the measured loss channels were not uniquely identified.\n\n## Sources for this explanation\n\n- [An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1): Author preprint: checked byline, main reported result and measurement limitations.\n",
      "summary": "Anderegg and colleagues loaded individual calcium monofluoride molecules into five optical tweezers and used fluorescence to identify occupied sites. In the reported setup, the average loading probability was about 34% per trap; the authors obtained 92% detection fidelity under optimized imaging conditions. The team also studied loss associated with collisions.",
      "title": "Single laser-cooled molecules are trapped and imaged in an optical tweezer array"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:992c3ba693c22c3e278590826a2fa2b8cd41892351a73fe65e72c6b6d6af04ed"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "anderegg-single-caf-optical-tweezer-array-2019",
    "entry_id": "anderegg-single-caf-optical-tweezer-array-2019",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Single laser-cooled molecules are trapped and imaged in an optical tweezer array",
    "context": "Atomic and molecular physics / single-particle trapping",
    "track": "Reusable scientific method, experimental result or historical framework",
    "band": "A",
    "modifier": null,
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-27",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-27",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Anderegg and colleagues loaded individual calcium monofluoride molecules into five optical tweezers and used fluorescence to identify occupied sites. In the reported setup, the average loading probability was about 34% per trap; the authors obtained 92% detection fidelity under optimized imaging conditions. The team also studied loss associated with collisions.",
    "scope": "Anderegg and colleagues loaded individual calcium monofluoride molecules into five optical tweezers and used fluorescence to identify occupied sites. In the reported setup, the average loading probability was about 34% per trap; the authors obtained 92% detection fidelity under optimized imaging conditions. The team also studied loss associated with collisions. Loading was stochastic, and detection fidelity is not the same as loading probability. The experiment did not demonstrate a defect-free rearranged array or a molecular quantum gate. Collision rates depend on estimates and the measured loss channels were not uniquely identified.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original works support the scoped statement and contribution attribution. WRS has not independently replayed experiments or reconstructed a full mathematical proof. Loading was stochastic, and detection fidelity is not the same as loading probability. The experiment did not demonstrate a defect-free rearranged array or a molecular quantum gate. Collision rates depend on estimates and the measured loss channels were not uniquely identified.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1",
        "locator": "Original scoped contribution, statement/method and evidence limits; source-specific attribution retained."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "The named authors in the research record",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "These are the source-listed authors of this specific paper. Individual effort, author nationality and unresolved cross-record identities are not inferred."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "105000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": {
    "id": "anderegg-single-caf-optical-tweezer-array-2019",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:2c213480-9543-4b92-a2a8-d7664c437617",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:c278c24ae09feb0780df16442881a2785f61c7551345714ca50ea58d7d8b7625"
    },
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "A row of tiny light traps",
        "text": "An optical tweezer is a tightly focused beam of light that can hold a small particle near its focus. Here the team used five such traps to study individual cold molecules, rather than treating a large cloud as one object. The traps are a laboratory tool, not physical tweezers that squeeze the molecule. Their focused light creates a potential that can hold a particle near a chosen location under the reported conditions."
      },
      {
        "title": "How did they identify a molecule?",
        "text": "The researchers illuminated the traps and collected fluorescence. Photon counts helped distinguish an empty site from an occupied one. The experiment also used collisions under light to remove multiple occupancy, making single-site analysis possible. The measurement is probabilistic: there can be background counts or too little collected light. A detection method is assessed by how well its thresholds separate the observed distributions."
      },
      {
        "title": "Two percentages answer different questions",
        "text": "The average loading probability was about 34% per trap. Under optimized imaging conditions, the reported detection fidelity was 92%. The first describes how often a site was loaded; the second describes how well a measurement distinguishes occupancy under that procedure. One does not imply the other. As a teaching calculation, if each of five sites had a 34% loading probability, the expected number of occupied sites would be five times 0.34, or 1.7. This average does not mean that a single image contains 1.7 molecules, and it is not a measured quantum-gate success rate."
      },
      {
        "title": "What came next?",
        "text": "The five sites were not deterministically filled, and this paper did not demonstrate a quantum gate between molecules. The authors studied collision-related loss, whose underlying channels were not uniquely settled by the reported measurements. Not every lost molecule reveals which collision process caused its loss. A result can support a useful platform while leaving the detailed loss mechanism unresolved."
      },
      {
        "title": "Try a small source check",
        "text": "Ask your agent to find the figure with the five traps and the text reporting the two percentages. Have it label one as loading and the other as detection, then verify those labels against the linked paper. Do not report either percentage as a probability of a successful quantum computation. If your agent multiplies the loading and detection percentages, ask it to state the event and assumptions first. The original article reports those values for different purposes and they should not automatically be presented as a combined outcome."
      }
    ],
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules (author preprint, version 1)",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00497v1",
        "locator": "Author preprint: checked byline, main reported result and measurement limitations."
      }
    ]
  },
  "reading_status": "EXPLANATORY_GUIDE"
}