{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "ai-oct-neural-operators-gkn-fno",
    "title": "Graph-kernel and Fourier neural operators",
    "summary": "Learns parameterized maps between input and solution functions through shared integral-operator layers; GKN approximates kernels by graph message passing and Nyström sampling, while FNO parameterizes truncated Fourier modes for efficient grid evaluation.",
    "boundary": "Resolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee.",
    "area": "Neural operators and scientific machine learning",
    "topic": "Artificial intelligence",
    "year": 2020,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "ALGORITHM",
    "package_id": "ai-oct-neural-operators-gkn-fno",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:1e21006a9e458e46d492d7bbb23b2ca24ec27c2af7cd4e6fa942b577693f30cc"
    },
    "humans": [
      "Zongyi Li",
      "Nikola Kovachki",
      "Kamyar Azizzadenesheli",
      "Burigede Liu",
      "Kaushik Bhattacharya",
      "Andrew Stuart",
      "Anima Anandkumar"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "src-ai-oct-2003-03485v1-primary",
        "title": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
      },
      {
        "id": "src-ai-oct-2010-08895v1-primary",
        "title": "Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.08895v1"
      }
    ],
    "points": "320000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "ai-oct-neural-operators-gkn-fno",
      "entry_id": "ai-oct-neural-operators-gkn-fno",
      "band": "S",
      "modifier": "-",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:1e21006a9e458e46d492d7bbb23b2ca24ec27c2af7cd4e6fa942b577693f30cc"
      },
      "what_changed": "Learns parameterized maps between input and solution functions through shared integral-operator layers; GKN approximates kernels by graph message passing and Nyström sampling, while FNO parameterizes truncated Fourier modes for efficient grid evaluation.",
      "scope": "Learns parameterized maps between input and solution functions through shared integral-operator layers; GKN approximates kernels by graph message passing and Nyström sampling, while FNO parameterizes truncated Fourier modes for efficient grid evaluation. Resolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:1e21006a9e458e46d492d7bbb23b2ca24ec27c2af7cd4e6fa942b577693f30cc"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Zongyi Li",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Nikola Kovachki",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Kamyar Azizzadenesheli",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Burigede Liu",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Kaushik Bhattacharya",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Andrew Stuart",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "Anima Anandkumar",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-1",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.08895v1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "Resolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee.",
        "domain": "Neural operators and scientific machine learning"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1"
        },
        {
          "citation": "Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.08895v1"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Graph-kernel and Fourier neural operators\n\n## The question\n\nAn ordinary prediction model might map a fixed list of inputs to a fixed list of outputs. A physical problem often asks for something larger: take an entire initial field or material-coefficient function and predict an entire solution field. Neural operators aim to learn this function-to-function relationship, so the idea is not tied only to one numbered list of grid points.\n\n## The idea\n\nThe source family develops shared operator layers, including graph-based kernel constructions and Fourier-domain layers. Fourier methods express patterns as combinations of waves. A learned layer can transform selected frequency components and combine them with local processing. Sharing this structure across discretizations creates a route to studying resolution transfer, rather than training unrelated models for every grid size.\n\n## Why it matters\n\nThe important advance is a reusable approach to learning families of physical maps. It is separate from proving that a particular trained network accurately solves every equation. Training examples usually come from observations or numerical solvers, and producing them costs resources. A rapid forward prediction is not the full cost of building the model or establishing where it can be trusted.\n\n## A teaching example\n\nFor an original classroom picture, imagine predicting the temperature across a metal plate after an initial heat pattern is supplied. A coarse grid and a fine grid describe the same underlying field at different sampling points. Transferring a learned rule between them is attractive, but fine-scale patterns absent from training may still be missed. Fourier truncation deliberately limits which frequency information is represented.\n\n## Scope and a useful next step\n\nChoose one small published equation example and separate training, interpolation and out-of-distribution tests. Record grid spacing, boundary conditions and reference-solver error. Compare predictions at a second resolution without hiding the data-generation cost. A finite successful test supports that stated range; it does not certify arbitrary-resolution accuracy or a universal replacement for numerical analysis. Resolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nResolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee.\n\n## Sources for this explanation\n\n- [Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1): Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment.\n- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.08895v1): Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment.\n",
      "summary": "Learns parameterized maps between input and solution functions through shared integral-operator layers; GKN approximates kernels by graph message passing and Nyström sampling, while FNO parameterizes truncated Fourier modes for efficient grid evaluation.",
      "title": "Graph-kernel and Fourier neural operators"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:1e21006a9e458e46d492d7bbb23b2ca24ec27c2af7cd4e6fa942b577693f30cc"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:e35ff5e9c9887b8637be036dfa5a0d799c2e2a6d4d5172333290444d2d535f81"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:1e21006a9e458e46d492d7bbb23b2ca24ec27c2af7cd4e6fa942b577693f30cc"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "ai-oct-neural-operators-gkn-fno",
    "entry_id": "ai-oct-neural-operators-gkn-fno",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Graph-kernel and Fourier neural operators",
    "context": "Neural operators and scientific machine learning",
    "track": "Human-designed research method or resource",
    "band": "S",
    "modifier": "-",
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-16",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-16",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Learns parameterized maps between input and solution functions through shared integral-operator layers; GKN approximates kernels by graph message passing and Nyström sampling, while FNO parameterizes truncated Fourier modes for efficient grid evaluation.",
    "scope": "Learns parameterized maps between input and solution functions through shared integral-operator layers; GKN approximates kernels by graph message passing and Nyström sampling, while FNO parameterizes truncated Fourier modes for efficient grid evaluation. Resolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original sources describe this contribution and its evidence limits. WRS has not independently reconstructed the full scientific claims. Resolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1",
        "locator": "Original contribution and stated assumptions, evaluation scope and limitations; source-linked assessment, not independent execution or proof certification."
      },
      {
        "title": "Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.08895v1",
        "locator": "Original contribution and stated assumptions, evaluation scope and limitations; source-linked assessment, not independent execution or proof certification."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "Source-listed authors and technical contributors",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:1e21006a9e458e46d492d7bbb23b2ca24ec27c2af7cd4e6fa942b577693f30cc"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "320000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": {
    "id": "ai-oct-neural-operators-gkn-fno",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:df1a5b95-1137-47bd-ab51-b8acd2ef67f9",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:1e21006a9e458e46d492d7bbb23b2ca24ec27c2af7cd4e6fa942b577693f30cc"
    },
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "The question",
        "text": "An ordinary prediction model might map a fixed list of inputs to a fixed list of outputs. A physical problem often asks for something larger: take an entire initial field or material-coefficient function and predict an entire solution field. Neural operators aim to learn this function-to-function relationship, so the idea is not tied only to one numbered list of grid points."
      },
      {
        "title": "The idea",
        "text": "The source family develops shared operator layers, including graph-based kernel constructions and Fourier-domain layers. Fourier methods express patterns as combinations of waves. A learned layer can transform selected frequency components and combine them with local processing. Sharing this structure across discretizations creates a route to studying resolution transfer, rather than training unrelated models for every grid size."
      },
      {
        "title": "Why it matters",
        "text": "The important advance is a reusable approach to learning families of physical maps. It is separate from proving that a particular trained network accurately solves every equation. Training examples usually come from observations or numerical solvers, and producing them costs resources. A rapid forward prediction is not the full cost of building the model or establishing where it can be trusted."
      },
      {
        "title": "A teaching example",
        "text": "For an original classroom picture, imagine predicting the temperature across a metal plate after an initial heat pattern is supplied. A coarse grid and a fine grid describe the same underlying field at different sampling points. Transferring a learned rule between them is attractive, but fine-scale patterns absent from training may still be missed. Fourier truncation deliberately limits which frequency information is represented."
      },
      {
        "title": "Scope and a useful next step",
        "text": "Choose one small published equation example and separate training, interpolation and out-of-distribution tests. Record grid spacing, boundary conditions and reference-solver error. Compare predictions at a second resolution without hiding the data-generation cost. A finite successful test supports that stated range; it does not certify arbitrary-resolution accuracy or a universal replacement for numerical analysis. Resolution-transfer and solver-speed results are empirical and exclude training/data-generation cost; FNO FFT implementation assumes a uniform grid and truncated periodic kernel. No universal trained-solver accuracy or existence-of-optimal-training guarantee."
      }
    ],
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485v1",
        "locator": "Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment."
      },
      {
        "title": "Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.08895v1",
        "locator": "Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment."
      }
    ]
  },
  "reading_status": "EXPLANATORY_GUIDE"
}
