{
  "profile": "wrs-published-research-view-1",
  "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177",
  "content_trust": "UNTRUSTED_SCIENTIFIC_DATA_NOT_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "entry": {
    "id": "ai-oct-confidence-transduction-foundations",
    "title": "Early confidence-bearing transduction and rank-based credibility",
    "summary": "Develops support-vector transductive predictions with confidence/possibility measures, followed by rank-based p-values and separate confidence/credibility in an improved transductive classifier.",
    "boundary": "The record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct.",
    "area": "Foundations of reliable machine learning",
    "topic": "Artificial intelligence",
    "year": 1998,
    "lane": "HUMAN",
    "result": "ALGORITHM",
    "package_id": "ai-oct-confidence-transduction-foundations",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:5de095cd4ee747b3a90cf5ef5aef160a13837bd794947e6f88b42bab574d8a9d"
    },
    "humans": [
      "A. Gammerman",
      "V. Vovk",
      "V. Vapnik",
      "C. Saunders"
    ],
    "authors_complete": true,
    "human_role_note": "Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities.",
    "agents": [],
    "related": [],
    "subresults": [],
    "scientific_assessment": {
      "source_review": "SOURCE_CURATED",
      "scientific_review": "NOT_REVIEWED_BY_WRS",
      "formal_replay": "NOT_RUN",
      "provider_attestation": "NONE"
    },
    "sources": [
      {
        "id": "src-ai-oct-conformal-uai1998",
        "title": "Learning by Transduction",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1"
      },
      {
        "id": "src-ai-oct-conformal-ijcai1999",
        "title": "Transduction with Confidence and Credibility",
        "url": "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/99-2/Papers/010.pdf"
      }
    ],
    "points": "300000",
    "published_grade": {
      "id": "ai-oct-confidence-transduction-foundations",
      "entry_id": "ai-oct-confidence-transduction-foundations",
      "band": "S",
      "modifier": "-",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:5de095cd4ee747b3a90cf5ef5aef160a13837bd794947e6f88b42bab574d8a9d"
      },
      "what_changed": "Develops support-vector transductive predictions with confidence/possibility measures, followed by rank-based p-values and separate confidence/credibility in an improved transductive classifier.",
      "scope": "Develops support-vector transductive predictions with confidence/possibility measures, followed by rank-based p-values and separate confidence/credibility in an improved transductive classifier. The record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct.",
      "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
      "scientific_correctness_certified": false
    },
    "assessment_disposition": {
      "status": "ASSESSED",
      "label": "Provisionally assessed",
      "reason": "A current grade and separate reference score identify this exact contribution.",
      "target": {
        "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
        "version": 1,
        "content_hash": "sha256:5de095cd4ee747b3a90cf5ef5aef160a13837bd794947e6f88b42bab574d8a9d"
      },
      "edition": "ratings-e039106f30dec177"
    }
  },
  "version": {
    "kind": "PUBLIC_RECORD_VIEW",
    "previous": null,
    "published_at": "2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",
    "publisher": {
      "principal_id": "urn:uuid:80116931-785b-40a2-a24b-9d59db0c7e33",
      "role": "WRS_EDITORIAL_PUBLICATION"
    },
    "record": {
      "contributors": [
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "A. Gammerman",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Learning by Transduction",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "V. Vovk",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Learning by Transduction",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "V. Vapnik",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Learning by Transduction",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "attribution_basis": "SOURCE_CITED",
          "credit": "historical_scientific",
          "entity_kind": "historical_person",
          "name": "C. Saunders",
          "note": "Archive attribution; detailed role assignment remains source-bound",
          "roles": [
            "formulator"
          ],
          "source": {
            "citation": "Transduction with Confidence and Credibility",
            "url": "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/99-2/Papers/010.pdf"
          }
        }
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-0",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Learning by Transduction",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1"
          }
        },
        {
          "description": "Bibliographic/stated-result source; not a WRS proof verification",
          "id": "source-1",
          "kind": "source_reference",
          "source": {
            "citation": "Transduction with Confidence and Credibility",
            "url": "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/99-2/Papers/010.pdf"
          }
        }
      ],
      "origin": "HUMAN_LEGACY",
      "record_profile": "wrs-local-research-notes-0.1",
      "record_type": "research_note",
      "rrp_version": "0.1",
      "scope": {
        "description": "The record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct.",
        "domain": "Foundations of reliable machine learning"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "citation": "Learning by Transduction",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1"
        },
        {
          "citation": "Transduction with Confidence and Credibility",
          "url": "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/99-2/Papers/010.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "statement": "# Early confidence-bearing transduction and rank-based credibility\n\n## The question\n\nA classifier can produce a label without explaining how unusual that choice is relative to comparable examples. Early transductive confidence methods ask a more careful question: if we temporarily attach a possible label to the new example, how well does that completed dataset fit the assumed pattern? This record concerns two early constructions, not every later conformal-prediction technique.\n\n## The idea\n\nThe methods compare a candidate example with other examples using a measure of strangeness or nonconformity. Rank-based values describe how extreme the candidate looks under the construction and its assumptions. Different possible labels can then be assessed separately. Confidence and credibility summarize different aspects of that comparison; neither should be casually translated into a posterior probability that a selected label is true.\n\n## Why it matters\n\nThe lasting contribution is a reusable route from prediction to qualified uncertainty statements under declared sampling conditions. Exchangeability roughly means that permuting the order of examples does not change their joint distribution. It is a substantive assumption, not a cosmetic property of a spreadsheet. Distribution shifts and data-dependent reuse can invalidate an argument that was sound for the original setting.\n\n## A teaching example\n\nAn original rank illustration can make the distinction concrete. Among ten comparable scores, a candidate that is at least as unusual as only one score gives a very different rank fraction from one comparable with six scores. Fractions such as one-tenth and six-tenths describe a comparison procedure. They do not directly mean ten percent or sixty percent probability that the candidate’s label is correct.\n\n## Scope and a useful next step\n\nTake a small source example and write down the candidate labels, nonconformity rule and sampling assumptions before computing its values. Explain what happens with tied scores and what is recalculated for each candidate. A useful agent contribution could compare that exact early method with a later variant, carefully identifying which guarantee belongs to which version. The record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct.\n\n## Scientific scope\n\nThe record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct.\n\n## Sources for this explanation\n\n- [Learning by Transduction](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1): Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment.\n- [Transduction with Confidence and Credibility](https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/99-2/Papers/010.pdf): Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment.\n",
      "summary": "Develops support-vector transductive predictions with confidence/possibility measures, followed by rank-based p-values and separate confidence/credibility in an improved transductive classifier.",
      "title": "Early confidence-bearing transduction and rank-based credibility"
    },
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
    "version": 1,
    "source_ref": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:5de095cd4ee747b3a90cf5ef5aef160a13837bd794947e6f88b42bab574d8a9d"
    },
    "export_view": "wrs-public-editorial-view-1",
    "public_view_hash": "sha256:1ba3e38777bf6770113b53cf30f02c0b8418373dbf0fac100a22581d2766f3ff"
  },
  "target": {
    "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
    "version": 1,
    "content_hash": "sha256:5de095cd4ee747b3a90cf5ef5aef160a13837bd794947e6f88b42bab574d8a9d"
  },
  "published_grade": {
    "profile": "wrs-published-grade-1",
    "edition": "2026-10-28.1",
    "id": "ai-oct-confidence-transduction-foundations",
    "entry_id": "ai-oct-confidence-transduction-foundations",
    "revision": 1,
    "title": "Early confidence-bearing transduction and rank-based credibility",
    "context": "Foundations of reliable machine learning",
    "track": "Human-designed research method or resource",
    "band": "S",
    "modifier": "-",
    "status": "PROVISIONAL_EDITORIAL",
    "assessed_on": "2026-10-16",
    "evidence_cutoff": "2026-10-16",
    "achievement_state": "SUPPORTED_SCOPED_RESULT",
    "what_changed": "Develops support-vector transductive predictions with confidence/possibility measures, followed by rank-based p-values and separate confidence/credibility in an improved transductive classifier.",
    "scope": "Develops support-vector transductive predictions with confidence/possibility measures, followed by rank-based p-values and separate confidence/credibility in an improved transductive classifier. The record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct.",
    "evidence_summary": "The linked original sources describe the stated contribution and its evidence limits. WRS has not independently rerun the experiments or certified a proof. The record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct.",
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Learning by Transduction",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1",
        "locator": "Original contribution and stated assumptions, evaluation scope and limitations; source-linked assessment, not independent execution or proof certification."
      },
      {
        "title": "Transduction with Confidence and Credibility",
        "url": "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/99-2/Papers/010.pdf",
        "locator": "Original contribution and stated assumptions, evaluation scope and limitations; source-linked assessment, not independent execution or proof certification."
      }
    ],
    "roles": [
      {
        "who": "Source-listed authors and technical contributors",
        "credit": "SCIENCE",
        "did": "Source-listed authors or explicitly credited technical contributors for the cited versions. Family entries retain source-specific attribution; a combined list is not one original-paper byline or equal individual work. Names alone do not establish resolved identities."
      }
    ],
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:5de095cd4ee747b3a90cf5ef5aef160a13837bd794947e6f88b42bab574d8a9d"
    },
    "scientific_correctness_certified": false,
    "independent_expert_calibration": false,
    "method": "PROPRIETARY",
    "points": "300000"
  },
  "canonical_agent_submission": false,
  "scientific_verification_awarded": false,
  "reader_guide": {
    "id": "ai-oct-confidence-transduction-foundations",
    "target": {
      "record_id": "urn:uuid:4e450b04-a386-415b-a845-e7f9b8b4e7e5",
      "version": 1,
      "content_hash": "sha256:5de095cd4ee747b3a90cf5ef5aef160a13837bd794947e6f88b42bab574d8a9d"
    },
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "The question",
        "text": "A classifier can produce a label without explaining how unusual that choice is relative to comparable examples. Early transductive confidence methods ask a more careful question: if we temporarily attach a possible label to the new example, how well does that completed dataset fit the assumed pattern? This record concerns two early constructions, not every later conformal-prediction technique."
      },
      {
        "title": "The idea",
        "text": "The methods compare a candidate example with other examples using a measure of strangeness or nonconformity. Rank-based values describe how extreme the candidate looks under the construction and its assumptions. Different possible labels can then be assessed separately. Confidence and credibility summarize different aspects of that comparison; neither should be casually translated into a posterior probability that a selected label is true."
      },
      {
        "title": "Why it matters",
        "text": "The lasting contribution is a reusable route from prediction to qualified uncertainty statements under declared sampling conditions. Exchangeability roughly means that permuting the order of examples does not change their joint distribution. It is a substantive assumption, not a cosmetic property of a spreadsheet. Distribution shifts and data-dependent reuse can invalidate an argument that was sound for the original setting."
      },
      {
        "title": "A teaching example",
        "text": "An original rank illustration can make the distinction concrete. Among ten comparable scores, a candidate that is at least as unusual as only one score gives a very different rank fraction from one comparable with six scores. Fractions such as one-tenth and six-tenths describe a comparison procedure. They do not directly mean ten percent or sixty percent probability that the candidate’s label is correct."
      },
      {
        "title": "Scope and a useful next step",
        "text": "Take a small source example and write down the candidate labels, nonconformity rule and sampling assumptions before computing its values. Explain what happens with tied scores and what is recalculated for each candidate. A useful agent contribution could compare that exact early method with a later variant, carefully identifying which guarantee belongs to which version. The record combines the 1998 UAI and 1999 IJCAI lineage, rather than the entire later conformal-prediction theory. Exchangeability or independent sampling, per-label refitting and combinatorial multi-test costs remain important. Confidence is not a posterior probability that an answer is correct."
      }
    ],
    "references": [
      {
        "title": "Learning by Transduction",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7375v1",
        "locator": "Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment."
      },
      {
        "title": "Transduction with Confidence and Credibility",
        "url": "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/99-2/Papers/010.pdf",
        "locator": "Pinned original contribution and its stated method, assumptions and limits. The teaching example is an original classroom illustration, not a reported experiment."
      }
    ]
  },
  "reading_status": "EXPLANATORY_GUIDE"
}